On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:13:10PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 14:59:01 BST Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:46:34AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> >
> > > So it doesn't even depend on the doc USE flag.
> >
> > Strange. On my system...
>
>
>
>
On 2020-07-21 12:00, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> That only requires 6 new packages (two of them are
> acct-{user,group}/polkitd, so it's only 4 new "real" packages. Of
> course every self-respecting package needs to install at least one new
> programming language -- this time it's
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:13:22PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> See how it receives the address from the router and then gives a prompt
> again, then it mounts network file systems where I should type in a
> command but that isn't me.. To get a prompt again, I have to hit the
> return key. Why does it
Howdy,
It has been doing this for as long as I can recall. I'm pretty sure it
did this on my old system before this one as well. This is what it does.
root@fireball / # /etc/init.d/net.eth1 restart
* Caching service dependencies
...
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 12:01, Matthias Hanft wrote:
>
> I don't know "getmail", but "fetchmail" runs here since 10 years
> without any problems. Just put a line like
+1
On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 14:59:01 BST Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:46:34AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> > So it doesn't even depend on the doc USE flag.
>
> Strange. On my system...
But if you upgrade to 10.0.1, as I did today, you'll find things have changed.
At
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:46:34AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> So it doesn't even depend on the doc USE flag.
>
Strange. On my system...
==
USE="-doc" emerge -pv llvm
[i660][root][~] USE="-doc" emerge -pv llvm
These are
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:25:01PM -, Grant Edwards wrote
> On 2020-07-22, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:29:48AM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> Yes, that's what I did months ago, and everything worked fine with
> >> Xorg using the "suid" flag and without consolekit or
On 2020-07-22, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> >> Users who do not wish to use logind interface or have rare hardware
>> >> that does not use KMS and because of that, require root privileges
>> >> to operate, can manually re-enable 'suid' and disable 'elogind' USE
>> >> flags in order to preserve the
On 2020-07-22, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:29:48AM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Yes, that's what I did months ago, and everything worked fine with
>> Xorg using the "suid" flag and without consolekit or elogind -- until
>> this morning, when pam refused to upgrade unless I
Are there any SAS drive controller cards that go in a PCI slot (Not PCI
express). I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find one.
-- “The whole world is watching! The whole world is watching!”
>On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:02:43 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
>> Would "fetchmail" work as a drop-in replacement for getmail here? Are
>> there any better, simpler solutions?
>
>I switched to getmail years ago because of frustrations with fetchmail.
>At the moment I have getmail in my overlay and
Am Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:01:47 +0200
schrieb "J. Roeleveld" :
> I would recommend upgrading to a more recent mainboard or just using
> SATA.
Yeah, sure, but the OP wrote:
"I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find one."
cu
Gerrit
> Would "fetchmail" work as a drop-in replacement for getmail here? Are
> there any better, simpler solutions?
> Walter Dnes
I generally use mpop, and msmtp to send mail.
I suppose you could use mutt; I also have Steffen Nurpmeso's s-mailx on the
back of my mind, having used nail when I was
Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> Would "fetchmail" work as a drop-in replacement for getmail here? Are
> there any better, simpler solutions?
I don't know "getmail", but "fetchmail" runs here since 10 years
without any problems. Just put a line like
poll securepop.t-online.de proto pop3
user
On 22 July 2020 10:53:57 CEST, "Gerrit Kühn" wrote:
>Am Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:43:39 +0200
>schrieb Gerrit Kühn :
>
>> > Are there any SAS drive controller cards that go in a PCI slot (Not
>PCI
>> > express). I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find
>one.
>
>> I don't know any.
>
On 22 July 2020 10:43:39 CEST, "Gerrit Kühn" wrote:
>Am Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:13:22 +0200 (CEST)
>schrieb mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com:
>
>> Are there any SAS drive controller cards that go in a PCI slot (Not
>PCI
>> express). I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find one.
>
>I
Am Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:43:39 +0200
schrieb Gerrit Kühn :
> > Are there any SAS drive controller cards that go in a PCI slot (Not PCI
> > express). I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find one.
> I don't know any.
Looking around, I just found two (old) PCI-X based models. If I
On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 16:23:35 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 15:47:25 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Sync, re-emerge bind-tools and try again. The man pages are now
> > downloaded as a separate tarball, so Sphinx and deps are not longer
> > needed.
>
> And lo! 17 packages
Am Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:13:22 +0200 (CEST)
schrieb mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com:
> Are there any SAS drive controller cards that go in a PCI slot (Not PCI
> express). I suspect it's a silly question but I'd like to find one.
I don't know any. But if you're /that/ desperate: there are
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:39 PM Adam Carter wrote:
>
> Have you tried adding --tree to your emerge command?
>>
>>
> Yes, and both the dev-lang and virtual were both just leaves. Checked the
> world file and it has;
> dev-lang/rust
> virtual/rust
>
> Should it be just the virtual?
>
Answering my
> Have you tried adding --tree to your emerge command?
>
>
Yes, and both the dev-lang and virtual were both just leaves. Checked the
world file and it has;
dev-lang/rust
virtual/rust
Should it be just the virtual?
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:17:29 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> > Are you running stable or testing? Do you have anything rust-related
> > in package.accept_keywords?
> >
>
> No, nothing in /etc/portage/* System is testing/~amd64.
>
> However, qlop shows the last rust-bin installed was actually
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:02:43 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Would "fetchmail" work as a drop-in replacement for getmail here? Are
> there any better, simpler solutions?
I switched to getmail years ago because of frustrations with fetchmail.
At the moment I have getmail in my overlay and unmasked
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 6:29 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> You have emerged rust-145 from testing but portage wants to install
> virtual/rust-1.44.1 from stable. This looks like a keywording issue.
>
> Are you running stable or testing? Do you have anything rust-related in
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
