Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing

2023-08-25 Thread Emily Rowlands
On 25/08/2023 16:39, Peter Humphrey wrote: I have a precompiled package from before the mask was applied; is there a way to ebuild it in spite of the mask? You can put the package atom in /etc/portage/package.unmask. See portage(5) for more details. Emily

Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing

2023-08-25 Thread Jack
On 2023.08.25 11:39, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Friday, 25 August 2023 16:28:16 BST I wrote: > Now what? I can't do without webkit-gtk. I have a precompiled package from before the mask was applied; is there a way to ebuild it in spite of the mask? # find /var/cache/packages/dev-lang -name

Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing

2023-08-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday, 25 August 2023 16:28:16 BST I wrote: > Now what? I can't do without webkit-gtk. I have a precompiled package from before the mask was applied; is there a way to ebuild it in spite of the mask? # find /var/cache/packages/dev-lang -name ruby-3.0\*

Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing

2023-08-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday, 25 August 2023 14:51:34 BST I wrote: > I'm now in a hole, as I can't "use a newer Ruby version instead." I tried yanking and recompiling the docbook package, and that removed its dependency on ruby30. Then webkit-gkt with: $ grep -ir ruby /etc/portage

Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing

2023-08-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 00:14:03 BST Michael wrote: > I would think this would be at the end, not early in the build stage. I > mention it just in case it may be relevant. Hm. It seems not to be. I tried a different tack in the end: reinstalling from scratch. Now I find that ruby30 has