Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with alternate ROOT=

2019-05-29 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
r n --ask -e @world > > - Matthew Hi, Are any of them listed as build time dependency perhaps? If there are then they will be built for the host as it the host who's compiling and needs them. Kind regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] CLVM and CMAN use flags dropped?

2019-04-21 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
he hows or whys? a link to the notice is fine > I wanted to read it > before i hack the ebuild > thanks in advance! https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/search?q=clvm=Commits These 3 commits should give you enough information to find the reason, I'm not interested myself so I didnt dig deeper. Best easter regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Something strange with use flags

2018-11-22 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
lags at all. > > Why? Because they are not in the ebuild IUSE anymore (hence the %). From man emerge > %suffix newly added or removed Best regards Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] ARM 17.0 profile change

2018-09-22 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
September 22, 2018 9:56 PM, "Dan Johansson" wrote: > But better safe than sorry, so I am going to shutdown the Raspberry, > take out the CF-Card, make a copy of the card and THEN I will try the > profile change. Even better ;) Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] ARM 17.0 profile change

2018-09-22 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
ould take care of that. Don't forget to backup your packages (quickpkg */*) before doing the migration, it will help in case you need to rollback. Best regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] python targets problem

2018-08-25 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
ython3_5(-)?,python_targets_python3_6(-)?,-pyth > n_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_si > gle_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-)] > required by (dev-python/setuptools-36.7.2:0/0::gentoo, installed) > > Can anyone else read this mess & advise what to do ? > Perhaps just leave well along ... (smile) Why did you try these specifically? What does emerge -puDU world say? Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
August 23, 2018 10:28 AM, "Corentin “Nado” Pazdera" wrote: > August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey" wrote: > >> That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just >> before the line " * For security reasons..." was thi

Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
uld be reported. Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Update circle

2018-08-22 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
n > gcc (Gentoo 4.7.3-r1 p1.4, pie-0.5.5) 4.7.3 > Copyright (C) [...] > > Thanks! > > Best Reagrds, > > Zoltan Given how old this system is, I think it will be easier to setup a chroot with latest stage3 and buildpkg system tools in it. From the top of my head, you’d need to repackage portage and deps, python, gcc (you will love that one). I suggest reading the wiki for gcc upgrades as 4.7.3 is really old. Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Update circle

2018-08-22 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
N --verbose-conflicts --with-bdeps=y world say? What’s your portage version? What profile are you using? (eselect profile show) What is your gcc version? Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage hooks: Allow verbose output

2018-08-21 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
e me to write the error/success messages myself, or not? I see, ebegin/eend let you write a line of message at the ebegin, and will output any error. So you won't be able to see normal output with it. You could redirect the output to a file also, otherwise I don't know. Good luck Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage hooks: Allow verbose output

2018-08-21 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
ly want to know whether it built successfully or not? Regards, -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Replacement for gcruft: gcrud

2018-08-17 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
o /usr/lib64, with go packages installed (in /usr/lib64/go). With these informations, I suppose most will disappear when using realpath/switching to 17.1 profile. Thanks for your work, this will probably a excellent tool in a few commits ;) Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] remove from list please

2018-08-17 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
You should send a mail to gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org in order to unsubscribe from the list. Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Replacement for gcruft: gcrud

2018-08-16 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
listed files because of the multilib system with /lib symlink. For example, dhcpcd declared /lib/dhcpcd/dhcpcd-hooks, thus the realpath /lib64/dhcpcd/dhcpcd-hooks was listed in the removal suggestion. This should be fixed with profile 17.1 The log is so huge at the moment it is useless for me :/ % wc -l out.log 461575 out.log -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
5:11, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >> On 08/15 02:32, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: >> August 15, 2018 2:59 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Yes I did reboot the sustem. In my initial mail I mentioned a tool > called CUDA-Z and Blender, which both reports a missing CUDA device. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
least we know their version is not completely broken... Driver version: 396.51 Cuda version: 9.2.88 -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
lprit is either the > driver itsself or a missing (and therefor undocumented) configuration > step needed for the new drivers. > > The cards are not "old" in any sense. Ok, what I meant is : how did you check CUDA "was not working"? And could you check it on both cards. Also, as said by realnc, did you reboot ? -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
driver-174. Updates may need to change a config file after bringing breaking changes, it might not be the cause I agree. But its possible. Is CUDA disabled on both cards? I have a 970Ti, although my MB is different, we might try to compare the big differences in our systems? -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "No CUDA device found" with nvidia-drivers newer than nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1(

2018-08-15 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
/nvidia-drivers-378.13 static-libs uvm > > What else could be the reason for the problem? > How can I fix it? Can you also show content of modprobe.d file ? Did you read the whole wiki page ? Did you check for MSI interrupts ? https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NVidia/nvidia-drivers#Driver_fails_to_initialize_when_MSI_interrupts_are_enabled Regards, -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups without X

2018-08-14 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
August 14, 2018 5:32 PM, "Peter Humphrey" wrote: > On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 15:40:43 BST Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > >> Did you install `net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver` or >> `net-print/kyocera-mita-ppds` ? My guess is that cups misses some ppd >> fil

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups without X

2018-08-14 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
attached. > > -- > Regards, > Peter. Did you install `net-print/kyocera-1x2x-mfp-driver` or `net-print/kyocera-mita-ppds` ? My guess is that cups misses some ppd files. -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] flag icu

2018-08-13 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
8 May 2016) > # This target supports VTV #547040. >> =sys-devel/gcc-4.9 -vtv > > # Mike Frysinger (21 Oct 2014) > # This target supports ASAN/etc... #504200. > sys-devel/gcc -sanitize > > And where was it that the processor/arch flags are now listed? > > tia, > James > cat To check impact on negating icu on your system : `USE="-icu" emerge -puDU --with-bdeps=y world` And concerning processor/arch flags I’d suggest keep exploring profiles, take a look at make.defaults files. Here the different files you can find according to PMS https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-430005.2 -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

Re: [gentoo-user] flag icu

2018-08-13 Thread CorentinNadoPazdera
nce of system set. It may have a few bugs I did that for learning the inner workings of profiles mainly. It should'nt need much work to make it print USE flags details [1] https://gist.github.com/nado/44b392b50c0b71a7e22b98d6909bfa72 Best regards, -- Corentin “Nado” Pazdera