HE is just a party pooper :) j/k
On 1/14/06, Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Mark Shields wrote:
Can we let this thread die? Please?
Why? Can you remember a funnier one, ever?
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
So in reality Saviour Linux will not be a disturbution of it's own
just a branch of Gentoo (for example)
That is my take on it.
On 1/11/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Stewart wrote:
Really, we could make Gentoo the official distribution of Saviour
Linux. Personally, I think it
Thanks for spamming the gentoo-user list.
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow Linux Users!
We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
Saviour Linux is an easy and
Because they all mean the same thing :lol:
On 1/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
Please visit the website for more information, but here is the
You took the words right out of my mouth Iain :-)
On 1/10/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:36 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why only those words united, universal, unified sound strange to me?
Having
NO kidding... I have to say just by the way the website is worded it
sounds like a scam... You want to know what is even funnier is that
this spam message has generated a boat load of responses :)
Robin
On 1/10/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Davison wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2006
Of course. Blame gmail. Typical. LOL
That is probably what it is... If you check the gentoo-user archives
it should appear there.
On 1/9/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jamie Dobbs schreef:
Are there issues with the mailing lists at the moment? I have made a few
posts in the
Same to all :-)
On 12/31/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy New Year! Freedom and Peace to the Community!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
If you are looking to reach your gentoo computer, consider sshd. You
can search the gentoo wiki for help docs for setup and usuage.
http://www.gentoo-wiki.com
On 12/29/05, Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Dec 2005, at 17:28, Grant wrote:
... you just type:
ssh my.network.com
Great picture. I am always on the lookout for some nice tux wallpaper :-)
On 12/25/05, Stuart Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heheh
ice and scotch lovers normally leads to a minor riot, plus to those
Gentooists who do not live in the UK would not realise that it is
normally cold enough here
Of all the communities I am/have been a part of, Gentoo is the best one.
So I would like to wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a Safe Happy
New Year as well
:- )
Robin
On 12/24/05, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ernie Schroder schreef:
On Friday 23 December 2005 23:59, a tiny
Of all the editors I have to say Nano is the best. Being a former
Windows user : -)
Although this is totally off topic, I just had to let you know in case
you were wondering.
On 12/24/05, George Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Novick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if
The question is that when is OpenSync going to be stable... And part
of portage ?
On 12/22/05, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 00:46, Benjamin Fritzsche wrote:
Hi There!
Basically, OpenSync will replace all of the above, so that shouldn't be of
much worry
Neil Bothwick wrote:
But when you
have a lot of packages in package.keywords, you're best of switching to a
full testing system, IMO.
That is a pretty bold statement. A lot of packages are masked just
because they are untested on a particular architecture, and
sometimes you need that
And next time add them to package.use :-)
Just thought I would re-enforce that point.
Robin
On 12/21/05, Michael Kjorling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-12-21 16:35 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
modifying the default USE for them, but I did that at command line
(yeah, yeah, I know
That's what you get for trying to abandon Gentoo... LoL.
Robin
On 12/20/05, Martin S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must confess. I've been unfaithful.
For a day.
After thoroughly trashing my system (~x86) for the second time by
uncarefully upgrading my box I decided that I'd try something less
I am trying to emerge Net-SSLeay-1.25 as a dependency for Webmin and
it is failing. I tried searching for a solution with no success, and
I can't make sense of where the error is coming from.
Any ideas would be helpful.
Here it is:
emerge (1 of 3) dev-perl/Net-SSLeay-1.25 to /
md5 files
I had an instance where I needed to use smbpasswd -a user_name to add
a user to Samba. And I they don't need to be a member of the samba
group. In my Samba setup experiences anyway.
Hope this helps.
On 12/6/05, David Obwaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:52:46PM +0200,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 6, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] setup samba server
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
I had an instance where I needed to use smbpasswd -a user_name to add
a user to Samba. And I they don't need
Cool, I added myself as well. You have to understand that it is
limited by Google Maps... which most likely is out of date and
incomplete (since it is trying to cover the whole planet).
On 12/6/05, Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I would bet in being the first
Hi All,
I finally convinced my office to build all our new servers on Gentoo
(without regret), but I looking to move a few desktops to Gentoo as
well. My main obstacle right now is PocketPC and syncing them.
Calendar applications etc are not important, but retrieve files etc is
important. I
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 01:57, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have also a P4 + HT and I want to use it to. Have you tried the
CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP parameter. I will try it this evening.
Cheers
Uwe
Robin Atwood wrote:
On Monday 28 November 2005 17:36, Uwe Klosa wrote:
No they did not. I've got
Wouldn't leaving the CHOST at
i386-pc-linux-gnu build unoptimized binaries?
No.
Alexander Skwar
Thanks for that. My CHOST flag is set to i386-pc-linux-gnu even though
it is not. Just a piece of mind I guess not building unoptimized
binaries.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Gentoo has to be harder to use than other distros, you can't have full
control over the system and still have it do things automatically for
you.
I could not of said it any better.
And of the distros I have used Gentoo is the best, although not my
first. And I would not recommend it to
I get segment faults randomly when emerging packages... and I know it
is bad ram... so I would advise you to test it... :)
Regards.
On 9/12/05, Frank Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
so I hit this bug too. :( Well, the log itself says it's a bug and (even
worse) that nobody knows
followed the instructions at the gentoo Wiki
(http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ICC_and_Portage ), including adding
ncurses to /etc/portage/package.gcc, so it should be trying to compile
with GCC (and therefore this shouldn't be an ICC problem). Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
-Robin K.
--
gentoo
201 - 226 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
