[gentoo-user] Re: Very OT - Need help removing NTLDR [SOLVED]

2006-08-21 Thread hawat . thufir
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Michael Sullivan wrote: [...] I found this site: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_Boot_from_Windows_Bootloader_(NTLDR)_and_why#Single_disk_installation It's got my wife's computer doing what she wanted it to now, for the most part. I should have thought to look at the

[gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo on a PDA (mda III or xda III)

2006-08-21 Thread hawat . thufir
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, JC Denton wrote: From: JC Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Gentoo on a PDA (mda III or xda III) Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.user Hi Group! I was looking for a project that installs Gentoo on a PDA (MDA III or XDA III) but did not find something useful. Is there such

Re: [gentoo-user] USB sync/async mount

2006-03-27 Thread hawat . thufir
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tamas Sarga wrote: From: Tamas Sarga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gentoo-user] USB sync/async mount Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user Hi, I've read some docs about mount of USB keys, but I can not figure out that if I have /dev/sda1 /mnt/usbautonoauto,user

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread hawat . thufir
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote: From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs,

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread hawat . thufir
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote: From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user On 10/13/2004 11:10 PM, Felix Tiede wrote: submount is supposed to supersede

[gentoo-user] mozplugger is masked

2006-03-22 Thread hawat . thufir
It's masked: localhost ~ # emerge mozplugger Calculating dependencies !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy mozplugger have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - net-www/mozplugger-1.6.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - net-www/mozplugger-1.7.3

[gentoo-user] emerge java syntax

2006-03-22 Thread hawat . thufir
I'm at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/tiger-faq.xml, which gives the syntax as: emerge =sun-jdk-1.5* but the pretend isn't working as I expect it to. localhost ~ # localhost ~ # localhost ~ # emerge -p =sun-jdk-1.5* These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge java syntax

2006-03-22 Thread hawat . thufir
So, masked packages only require that package.keyword be edited, but hardmasked packages also require that package.unmask be edited? I see the sense in having different grades of unmasking, but not the need for two distinct files(?). thanks, Thufir -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] use flags, mplayer, lame

2006-03-22 Thread hawat . thufir
If down the road I realize that I've left out use flag for mplayer would I have to recompile mplayer? localhost ~ # localhost ~ # emerge -pv mplayer These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] media-sound/lame-3.96.1 -debug +gtk

[gentoo-user] core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir
I've thought about gentoo for some time, and getting closer to switching over from fedora. as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00

[gentoo-user] Re: core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: core packages for a dual-boot system I've thought about gentoo for some time, and getting closer to switching over from fedora. as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

[gentoo-user] Re: core packages for a dual-boot system

2006-03-19 Thread hawat . thufir
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. as can be seen, there's a vfat partition, /mnt/windows. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 17394484 14690156