Am 29.01.2013 20:48, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Thanks for sharing ... I quickly followed your suggestions and built
another service-file with your solution (you had typos btw - brigdge
;-) ). It works as well and is maybe even slimmer in execution.
I will just keep both versions around
Am 05.02.2013 23:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 29.01.2013 20:48, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Thanks for sharing ... I quickly followed your suggestions and built
another service-file with your solution (you had typos btw - brigdge
;-) ). It works as well and is maybe even slimmer in
Am 29.01.2013 20:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
For now I am happy to get my itches scratched ... I am absolutely ready
to learn and improve things. Sharing my first steps here maybe helps to
motivate other gentoo-users to give systemd a try?
here my latest scratches:
Took Canek's advice
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was one of the reasons to go back to openrc
back then.
I have no experience with that, but if it works in OpenRC it should
work in systemd. Probably
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was one of the reasons to go back to openrc
back then.
I have no experience
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger hurdle will be the bridging-setup for running
KVM-virtualization. This was
Am 29.01.2013 20:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
I'll note that in your version, you're ignoring the exit statuses of
each of those commands. From a correctness standpoint, I prefer
Stefan's version.
Thanks ;-)
Also thanks to Canek for the script-version ... I knew that way but
wanted to fully take
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
ps: my bigger
Am 29.01.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I really believe the most important thing abount systemd unit files is
that they are small and simple. You can also check the exit status
from each command in the script, or even better, you can do a test
after all the commands are done to
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 29.01.2013 20:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
I'll note that in your version, you're ignoring the exit statuses of
each of those commands. From a correctness standpoint, I prefer
Stefan's version.
Thanks ;-)
Also
Am 29.01.2013 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
When I debugged my way up to the current draft it was helpful to see
which line/command failed etc.
That's my point; you don't need (and I would venture to say, you
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 29.01.2013 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I really believe the most important thing abount systemd unit files is
that they are small and simple. You can also check the exit status
from each command in the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
Myths about systemd had an overwhelmingly majority of comments
positive to systemd,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
Myths about
And, BTW, I didn't mean behind in the sense that Gentoo doesn't
support systemd; I meant behind in the sense that us systemd users
get a lot flak just by mention it in the list.
And that's exactly why I see Gentoo as being ahead and actually your
talking about a few of the IMO more moronic
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
[...] but lets just agree to disagree [...]
Agreed.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
16 matches
Mail list logo
