Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-09 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. Enrico, since you are working with ebuilds and trying to add to the tree, you need to post on -dev. This list is for users trying to get help with getting packages to install, work and how to work with the programs they install. This list does

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-08 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Where's the common ground to combine all of that into one repository? The idea is a pipe dream. Fairly simple: use different branches. Hopefully, several distros would aggree on a common base, but thats not mandatory. The main point is, that

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-08 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu wrote: What the heck is the OSS-QM? Already posted it to the list several weeks ago: http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf cu -- -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:30:55 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: What the heck is the OSS-QM? Already posted it to the list several weeks ago: http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf Which list? You've been cross-posting to multiple lists, was that announcement cross-posted

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-08 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:30:55 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: What the heck is the OSS-QM? Already posted it to the list several weeks ago: http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf Which list? You've been cross-posting to multiple lists,

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 01:48:43 Dale wrote: Albert Hopkins wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? huh? This was sent to -dev too. It referenced this bug on that list.

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-06 Thread Willie Wong
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:29:04AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? --- Comment #4 from vap...@gentoo.org 2010-07-05 19:39 --- lemme clarify further: dont bother submitting ebuilds for any package in OSS-QM. we arent interested.

[gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? - Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org - From: bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org Subject: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???) To: weig...@metux.de Reply-To: DO NOT REPLY

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-05 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? huh?

Re: [gentoo-user] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-05 Thread Dale
Albert Hopkins wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? huh? This was sent to -dev too. It referenced this bug on that list. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326991 Still not sure what is going on with