Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:56:44 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I use it without PAM, I don't have PAM installed. Just use passdb passwd { } passdb shadow { } to have it authenticate through /etc/passwd. I'm nit sure if both are needed, I'll have to try with just one. I don't know

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fishing around for a pop3 server I settled on dovecot. After installation and few changes in well commented config. I get a show stopping error when attempting startup. ( not really commentary just apologizing for the stupid subject which was supposed to have

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with dovecot. I get this when a connection is attempted:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread Josh Helmer
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 18:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:18:24 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently has something to do with glibc and how it is compiled judging by the message on gmane: (This line will probably wrap so be alerted if you want to use it)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread Martins Steinbergs
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 21:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i got rid of it removing 'login' from authentications mechanisms in /etc/dovecot.conf section auth_default { mechanism = plain I have single user setup and I dont care much about security here, so maybe this isnt the best solution. I use

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
Josh Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just a guess, but: check your kernel config. See if CONFIG_INOTIFY is set. If not, recompile with that set and see if it behaves better. Its set: root # grep CONFIG_INOTIFY .config CONFIG_INOTIFY=y -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread reader
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reading that thread, it would appear that for this to happen you have to have installed =linux-headers-2.6.16 but not recompiled glibc. Check the dates from genlop glibc genlop linux-headers If the former is earlier, re-emerge it. Doesn't appear

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread Martins Steinbergs
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 01:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My setup is very similar ... no great need for security. My setting is the same as what you posted but then the pam stuff is in there too. What does your whole auth_default {} look like? (Everthing between opening and closing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?

2006-06-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:49:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know how much of that is needed. I wouldn't care if pam was bypassed too but not sure if it would work then. I use it without PAM, I don't have PAM installed. Just use passdb passwd { } passdb shadow { } to have it