[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-26 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 26 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is turning into a big time sink that I don't really have so I'll probably just use cygwin stuff to get some unix tools onto vista. But first, are you running gentoo in a vmware on vista? I was

[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-26 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 25 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I'm thinking it probably won't do any real good to monkey around with the kernel either, if the initramfs thing isn't the problem them it seems likely to be a vista problem. The kernel is exactly

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 26 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was just starting to think you might be friend material. Then you go and mention me and Vista in a positive sense in the same sentence. I shall now have to send some of the lads around to your

[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-25 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The kernel is exactly where you should be monkeying. I reckon you have a driver you need compiled in and it's a module because of the make allconfig. I went thru the makeconfig carefully. Even disallowing an early item allowing intramfs boot, built

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 26 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is turning into a big time sink that I don't really have so I'll probably just use cygwin stuff to get some unix tools onto vista. But first, are you running gentoo in a vmware on vista? I was just starting to think you might be friend

[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So assuming I've made some mistake in grub.conf I try to boot from grub command line. root = (hd0,0) (which is /dev/sda1 in linux terms) kernel /kernel-2.6.25-r1 Nope. Kernel needs a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: kernel /kernel-2.6.25-r1 root=(hd0)/sda3 Fails Won't work. (hd0) is a grub thing. You need a /dev/sda3 or similar in there I think you are wrong about that. But just a fine point and not

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread Don Jerman
On 4/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] In the screen shot provided note that it appears grub is expecting an intramfs and only lists those types of devices, rejecting both (hd0,0) and /dev/sda3.

[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aah, now I see. It's one of two things, and neither is your grub.conf. That's the kernel spitting that garbage at you, so your grub.conf is just fine. You have either: 1. Compiled in the need for an initrd and have not supplied one, or 2.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 25 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you want to use an initrd, or due the highly customized thing and dispense with it? OK, let me explain a bit. I started compiling a kernel for this install and somehow missed something important

[gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread reader
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Something seems to have changed with 2.6.25, more so than normal for new versions. For instance, b43 refuses point blank to work here or do anything remotely useful like a nice driver should. b43legacy doesn't work either. They both work with earlier

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub heartbreaker

2008-04-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 25 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I'm thinking it probably won't do any real good to monkey around with the kernel either, if the initramfs thing isn't the problem them it seems likely to be a vista problem. The kernel is exactly where you should be monkeying. I reckon you