On 2009-08-25, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
week and then changed back to unstable this week?
I think so, yes. If you read the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009-08-25, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwardsgrant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
week
On 2009-08-25, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
I rarely use Firefox on linux but, on windows, 3.5 takes a longer time
to load compared to 3.0 (and 3.0 took longer than 2.x). I'm sure
add-ons and update checks are contributing mostly to that, but I
remember the good old days
On 08/26/2009 01:01 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
[...]
I can't remember the reason, but it's a common complaint that Mozilla
products are slower in general on Linux (I even saw an article
claiming the windows version of FF running in WINE can outperform the
native Linux version of FF on the same
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com writes:
I haven't really paid much attention to start-up times, but
page loads in 3.5 feel a fair bit faster. I've also noticed
that 3.5 doesn't pause repeatedly while I'm typing a URL like
3.0 used to.
Page loads are faster, but page scrolling of some
5 matches
Mail list logo
