On 2007-02-22, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 05:06 -0800, Grant wrote:
I wonder if I need more power on the machine running the apps instead
of more bandwidth. It has 512MB and I do need to upgrade that, but it
feels like a bandwidth problem when I'm running
I wonder if I need more power on the machine running the apps instead
of more bandwidth. It has 512MB and I do need to upgrade that, but it
feels like a bandwidth problem when I'm running vmware via
X-Forwarding.
Could be bandwidth.
More likely it's latency. Most modern X apps seem to
On 22 February 2007 16:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
More likely it's latency. Most modern X apps seem to require
a lot of round-trips between client and server. The latency of
a Wifi link is probably 10-100X that of a wired Ethernet link,
even if the bandwidth is the same:
Where do you get
On 22 February 2007 17:05, Grant wrote:
I wonder if I need more power on the machine running the apps instead
of more bandwidth. It has 512MB and I do need to upgrade that, but it
feels like a bandwidth problem when I'm running vmware via
X-Forwarding.
Could be bandwidth.
On 2007-02-22, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if I need more power on the machine running the apps instead
of more bandwidth. It has 512MB and I do need to upgrade that, but it
feels like a bandwidth problem when I'm running vmware via
X-Forwarding.
Could be bandwidth.
On 2007-02-22, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 February 2007 16:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
More likely it's latency. Most modern X apps seem to require
a lot of round-trips between client and server. The latency of
a Wifi link is probably 10-100X that of a wired Ethernet link,
even
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:49:42 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-02-22, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 February 2007 16:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
More likely it's latency. Most modern X apps seem to require
a lot of round-trips between client and
7 matches
Mail list logo
