In 20090101213152.77d30...@krikkit,
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:14:16 -0600, »Q« wrote:
I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should know
what modules are needed for the hardware, and portage should keep
working as it does now.
Then
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:39:53 -0600, »Q« wrote:
I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should know
what modules are needed for the hardware, and portage should keep
working as it does now.
Then why the test and warning?
I haven't advocated a test and warning.
Am Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2009 23:39:53 schrieb »Q«:
Then why the test and warning?
I haven't advocated a test and warning. But why not?
There _is_ a test and warning. See very first mail in this thread.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:35:15 +0100
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@online.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2009 23:39:53 schrieb »Q«:
Then why the test and warning?
I haven't advocated a test and warning. But why not?
There _is_ a test and warning. See very first mail in this
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:26:20 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:39:53 -0600, »Q« wrote:
I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should
know what modules are needed for the hardware, and portage
should keep working as it does now.
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:09:23 -0600, »Q« wrote:
That's the point of this thread, the ebuild does perform a test before
installation, but goes ahead straight after the warning.
AFAIAC, the post-install log is exactly where the message belongs --
that's where I'd look if I'd broken my
In 20090102224554.57ea4...@krikkit,
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:09:23 -0600, »Q« wrote:
That's the point of this thread, the ebuild does perform a test
before installation, but goes ahead straight after the warning.
AFAIAC, the post-install log
On 2009-01-02, ?Q? boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
In 20090102224554.57ea4...@krikkit,
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:09:23 -0600, ?Q? wrote:
That's the point of this thread, the ebuild does perform a test
before installation, but goes ahead straight after the
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2009-01-02, ?Q? boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
In 20090102224554.57ea4...@krikkit,
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:09:23 -0600, ?Q? wrote:
That's the point of this thread, the ebuild does perform a test
before installation,
In 200901010423.25783.volker.armin.hemm...@tu-clausthal.de,
Volker Armin Hemmann volker.armin.hemm...@tu-clausthal.de wrote:
That is why you have to go to nvnews first and then upgrade.
Where is nvnews?
I've been going to http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html, selecting
the driver I'm
On 2009-01-01, Matt Causey matt.cau...@gmail.com wrote:
I am total Gentoo newb :D but it seems kind of fundamental to
the concept of this distribution that its users are going to
make themselves aware of the details of system updates. Short
of reading ridiculous amounts of doco...folks
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
[...]
I see many posts like this but few suggestions as to how the problem could
have been avoided ahead of time.
You can open a bug about it and suggest something.
On 01/01/09 Nikos Chantziaras said:
You can open a bug about it and suggest something.
I did yesterday when it happened.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of
On Donnerstag 01 Januar 2009, »Q« wrote:
In 200901010423.25783.volker.armin.hemm...@tu-clausthal.de,
Volker Armin Hemmann volker.armin.hemm...@tu-clausthal.de wrote:
That is why you have to go to nvnews first and then upgrade.
Where is nvnews?
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:28:55 -0500
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
Your philosophy seems to put an undue amount of work on the
administrator.
I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should know what
modules are needed for the hardware, and portage should keep
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:14:16 -0600, »Q« wrote:
I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should know what
modules are needed for the hardware, and portage should keep working as
it does now.
Then why the test and warning?
--
Neil Bothwick
God is real, unless specifically
16 matches
Mail list logo
