On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Daniel Mendler wrote:
But I think I found the problem. The packages are not masked in
emerge, but are shown as masked in eix. It seems to be only an eix
problem (version 0.10.5)
Daniel
Did you run update-eix?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Hi!
But I think I found the problem. The packages are not masked in
emerge, but are shown as masked in eix. It seems to be only an eix
problem (version 0.10.5)
Did you run update-eix?
Yes I did. It didn't help.
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:39:33 +0200, Daniel Mendler wrote:
But I think I found the problem. The packages are not masked in emerge,
but are shown as masked in eix. It seems to be only an eix problem
(version 0.10.5)
Try running a later eix, I use 0.12.4 here and the switch to 2008.0 was
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:39:33PM +0200, Daniel Mendler wrote:
Hi!
[snip]
But I think I found the problem. The packages are not masked in emerge, but
are shown as masked in eix. It seems to be only an eix problem (version
0.10.5)
eix-0.12.4 is the only version that currently works with the
Hi,
I switched to the 2008.0 profile with eselect profile set. Now every
ebuild is masked. Is the 2008.0 profile not yet usable or are some
special adjustments necessary?
Daniel Mendler
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:26:31 +0200, Daniel Mendler wrote:
I switched to the 2008.0 profile with eselect profile set. Now every
ebuild is masked.
Which 2008.0 profile? eselect shows four for amd64, probably the same
number for other arches, which one are you using?
--
Neil Bothwick
Why is
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 07:26:31 pm Daniel Mendler wrote:
Hi,
I switched to the 2008.0 profile with eselect profile set.
Now every ebuild is masked. Is the 2008.0 profile not yet
usable or are some special adjustments necessary?
Not sure in your case, although if you provide some more
7 matches
Mail list logo
