Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-11 Thread John Myers
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:50, Pere Gentoo wrote: What about this way: I've seen it on http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level # mkdir /etc/runlevels/noxdm # rc-update add x noxdm(add all services from the default runlevel except xdm) Modify /etc/inittab id:3:initdefault:

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-09 Thread A. Khattri
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Pere Gentoo wrote: Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and 5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it? I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a run

[gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual runlevels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6. They are resumed as boot, single, nonetwork and default. Fine. But how to get a runlevel as runlevel 3 on other distributions, with the same services and daemons as runevelel 5 or default but without

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Mark Shields
I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level On 5/7/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:55 +0200, Pere Gentoo wrote: I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread A. Khattri
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Mark Shields wrote: I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level AFAIK, the only difference between 5 and 3 is the lack of X in 3. So you can achieve the same result merely by disabling xdm from starting

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and 5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it? I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a run level? Thanks, On 5/7/05, A. Khattri

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level Thanks, this is what I was looking for. And of course this is the logical solution. Thanks, -- Pere ( -- Aesux -- ) --

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modify /etc/inittab so we could define the new runlevel in it without

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Nick Rout
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 21:17 +0200, Pere Gentoo wrote: On 5/7/05, Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modify