Dan Johansson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
[...]
I think the
Nick Rout wrote:
Piping to telnet worked with netkit-telnetd's client but not
telnet-bsd's
Then the software is really broken... Standard behaviour
of telnet is to NOT read from stdin.
That's, why there is netcat.
Alexander Skwar
--
Book: They'll come at you sideways. It's how they think:
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
[...]
I think the one I use is
Dan Johansson wrote:
Yes I know that I can just let the server disabled. But I was just wondering
if there where any alternatives so that the server don't get started by
accident. Will probably delete the server after the emerge.
Tanks for your input!
You might want to delete chmod and
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
changed. :-)
rm -f /sbin/init should remove the possibility of accidents :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top
On Tue April 25 2006 14:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
changed. :-)
rm -f /sbin/init should remove the
On Tue April 25 2006 14:46, John Jolet wrote:
I find that rm -rf .* works wonders for security.
Now guys, someone new is going to try one of these! :) And we all know
we've done that at one time or another. Mine was rm -fr /* filename
on a running sun box. :) during month-end
-Original Message-
From: Erik Zeek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:11 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to netkit-telnetd
On Tue April 25 2006 14:46, John Jolet wrote:
I find that rm -rf .* works wonders
Grr. I hate this keyboard.
Once would have been understandable, but I did mine twice
(only once as root though). It's fun to stare at the screen
wondering why it's taken 5 minutes to delete two hidden
directories, followed by a scream of, OH SH*T! which is
immediately followed by
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
changed. :-)
rm -f /sbin/init should remove the possibility of accidents :)
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:10:55 -0400, Erik Zeek wrote:
Once would have been understandable, but I did mine twice (only once as
root though). It's fun to stare at the screen wondering why it's taken
5 minutes to delete two hidden directories, followed by a scream of,
OH SH*T! which is
Just a warning, the netkit-telnetd and telnet-bsd clients do not work
identically.
I was recently testing some remote control software that connected to a
remote telnet port. The software would issue command like:
echo jump mainmenu | telnet mythtvbox 6546
Piping to telnet worked with
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 18:58, Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to netkit-telnetd':
Piping to telnet worked with netkit-telnetd's client but not
telnet-bsd's
Sound like one opens a new pty and the other just uses std{in,out,err}.
A good expect script
Am Dienstag, 25. April 2006 20:31 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
rm -f /sbin/init should remove the possibility of accidents :)
No, it wouldn't. People could still - by accident, of course - append
init=/bin/bash to their kernel command line. However, you'd need to try
hard to create an accident,
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
Regards,
--
Dan Johansson, http://www.dmj.nu
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
Regards,
I think the
On 4/24/06, Dan Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
Its lightweight, I mean
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
suggestions on alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave
just like the standard telnet-client (I have
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions
on alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the
standard telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
netcat - the one and only.
--
Best Regards,
Peper
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ time sudo emerge -vb
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
[...]
I think the one I use is called 'telnet-bsd'. It's just the client...
Thanks for the
22 matches
Mail list logo
