That's too bad. I thought the GPU on at least some of these boards
was capable of smooth 1080p playback. The Pandaboard ES claims Full
HD (1080p) multi-standard video encode/decode but I suppose that
doesn't mean it's stutter-free.
http://pandaboard.org/content/pandaboard-es
I have a Raspberry Pi, and doing what it was designed to do is
something it is very good at. It was designed to teach kids how to
program. It was not designed to play full HD video.
I'm interested to know whether it would be good as a network appliance.
Specifically, a NAT gateway machine
That's too bad. I thought the GPU on at least some of these boards
was capable of smooth 1080p playback. The Pandaboard ES claims Full
HD (1080p) multi-standard video encode/decode but I suppose that
doesn't mean it's stutter-free.
http://pandaboard.org/content/pandaboard-es
-
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:59:28 -0800
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Which of these would be the best choice for Gentoo? I have a
Beaglebone but now I'm looking for something with video for HD
playback.
- Grant
I'd say none of them (yet).
It doesn't matter what other features in the form
Which of these would be the best choice for Gentoo? I have a
Beaglebone but now I'm looking for something with video for HD
playback.
- Grant
I'd say none of them (yet).
It doesn't matter what other features in the form of fancy IO and neat
circuitry is put on such boards, they are
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:43:38 -0800
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Which of these would be the best choice for Gentoo? I have a
Beaglebone but now I'm looking for something with video for HD
playback.
- Grant
I'd say none of them (yet).
It doesn't matter what other
On Saturday 17 November 2012 20:03:04 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I have a Raspberry Pi, and doing what it was designed to do is
something it is very good at. It was designed to teach kids how to
program. It was not designed to play full HD video.
I'm interested to know whether it would be good as a
7 matches
Mail list logo
