Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread François-Xavier Carton
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:26:10AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 5/14/20 7:55 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 18:17:06 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > > > >> That seems interesting. Do we need to include Portage install prefix > >> (/var/tmp/portage/category/package/..., the

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 5/14/20 7:55 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2020 18:17:06 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > >> That seems interesting. Do we need to include Portage install prefix >> (/var/tmp/portage/category/package/..., the image path prefix before >> actually merging with /)? >> >> Regards, > >

RE: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Pengcheng Xu
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Bothwick > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:56 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without > rebuilding system packages > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 18:17:06 +

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 14 May 2020 18:17:06 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > That seems interesting. Do we need to include Portage install prefix > (/var/tmp/portage/category/package/..., the image path prefix before > actually merging with /)? > > Regards, No, just the --prefix=/home/blah/ that you want added

RE: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Pengcheng Xu
14, 2020 6:07 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without > rebuilding system packages > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 16:46:58 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > > > What you're trying to achieve sounded a l

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 14 May 2020 16:46:58 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > What you're trying to achieve sounded a lot like `./configure > --prefix=...` to me. If you're just dealing a small amount of things, > I would suggest modifying the ebuild (in a local overlay) and changes > where the program installs to.

[gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread François-Xavier Carton
Hi, Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX, however doing that will install all dependencies in the prefix, even if there are already installed in the system. I was hoping to install some packages in user

RE: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Pengcheng Xu
ilding packages in different prefix without > rebuilding system packages > > François-Xavier Carton wrote: > > > Hi, > > Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still > using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX, h

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread François-Xavier Carton
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:07:43AM +0100, Michael wrote: > On Thursday, 14 May 2020 06:13:33 BST Dale wrote: > > François-Xavier Carton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still > > > using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX,

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-14 Thread Michael
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 06:13:33 BST Dale wrote: > François-Xavier Carton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still > > using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX, however doing that > > will install all dependencies in the prefix, even

Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

2020-05-13 Thread Dale
François-Xavier Carton wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still > using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX, however doing that > will install all dependencies in the prefix, even if there are already > installed in the system. > > I was