On Sunday, 19 May 2019 00:49:03 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> In general you can mount stuff in containers without issue. There are
> two ways to go about it. One is to mount something on the host and
> bind-mount it into the container, typically at launch time. The other
> is to give the
On 5/18/19 7:04 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
Not that I do it (it would be a bit of a learning experience :-)
but this is where using ldap for user management would score ...
Centralized ID administration is nice. I've dabbled with the following:
· Manual UID & GID management
· Copying
On 5/18/19 5:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I'd be interested if there are other scripts people have put out
there, but I agree that most of the container solutions on Linux
are overly-complex.
Here's what I use for some networking, which probably qualifies as
extremely light weight
On 19/05/19 00:49, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I believe the reason the wiki says to be careful with mounts has more
> to do with UID/GID mapping. As you are using nfs this is already an
> issue you're probably dealing with. You're probably aware that
> running nfs with multiple hosts with
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:44 PM Grant Taylor
wrote:
>
> On 5/18/19 9:26 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Can anyone answer this?
>
> I would think that containers could be made to do this. But I'm not a
> fan of the containerization systems that I've seen. They seem to
On 5/18/19 9:26 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
Hi,
Can anyone answer this?
I can't comment on LXC or containers in general, but I will say that I
think that namespaces (which is largely what I think containers are)
could do this.
I'd suggest a mount, UTS, and possibly user
Hello list,
I use this box as a compile host for two other boxes on the LAN. From each of
those I NFS-export $PORTDIR to a chroot jail on this box, run portage etc. in
the jail as needed and then install the binaries on the smaller boxes.
Recently there've been several mentions of containers
7 matches
Mail list logo
