>> > Check /var/lib/portage/world_sets
>>
>> That file doesn't exist on my system.
>
> Which version of portage are you using? Sets are a feature of the
> 2.2 branch, as is the separate @system and 'world.
OK, I'm using portage-2.1.4.5. It's the latest amd64.
- Grant
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:32:36 -0800, Grant wrote:
> >
> > Check /var/lib/portage/world_sets
>
> That file doesn't exist on my system.
Which version of portage are you using? Sets are a feature of the
2.2 branch, as is the separate @system and 'world.
--
Neil Bothwick
... Never say anything
>> I think I'm getting system included within world too.
>
> Check /var/lib/portage/world_sets
That file doesn't exist on my system.
- Grant
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:54:12 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I was sort of in the discussion on -dev about this one. From my
> understanding, world and system works like it used to. @system and
> @world works the new way. However, when I type in emerge -ep world and
> then do emerge -pv @world, I get the
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:01:03 -0800, Grant wrote:
> I think I'm getting system included within world too.
Check /var/lib/portage/world_sets
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 41: Good grief
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Grant wrote:
>>> no, you have to do -e system first because system does not belong to world
>>> anymore (for a couple of month it does not belong to world anymore. 6 or
>>> something like that).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I was sort of in the discussion on -dev about this one. From my
>> under
>> no, you have to do -e system first because system does not belong to world
>> anymore (for a couple of month it does not belong to world anymore. 6 or
>> something like that).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I was sort of in the discussion on -dev about this one. From my
> understanding, world and system work
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>
> no, you have to do -e system first because system does not belong to world
> anymore (for a couple of month it does not belong to world anymore. 6 or
> something like that).
>
>
>
>
I was sort of in the discussion on -dev about this one. From my
understandi
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:28:57 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> no, you have to do -e system first because system does not belong to
> world anymore (for a couple of month it does not belong to world
> anymore. 6 or something like that).
Unless you have @system in /var/lib/portage/world_sets,
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:38:47 -0800, Grant wrote:
> # eselect profiles list
> !!! Error: Can't load module profiles
> Killed
profile not profiles.
--
Neil Bothwick
Oxymoron: Reagan memoirs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:05:25 Grant wrote:
> >> Going from non-hardened to hardened may run into some downgrading
> >> problems, however, in view of the above. For example, hardened devs
> >> still have not put gcc4 in stable (at least on x86, I don't know about
> >> amd64), so if you have g
>> Going from non-hardened to hardened may run into some downgrading
>> problems, however, in view of the above. For example, hardened devs
>> still have not put gcc4 in stable (at least on x86, I don't know about
>> amd64), so if you have gcc4 installed, you'll need to downgrade. Along
>> the same
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 19:51:37 Willie Wong wrote:
> Going from non-hardened to hardened may run into some downgrading
> problems, however, in view of the above. For example, hardened devs
> still have not put gcc4 in stable (at least on x86, I don't know about
> amd64), so if you have gcc4 in
On Dienstag 23 Dezember 2008, Grant wrote:
> >> >> >> I've looked over this:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> but I'm still not sure if I can choose any of the above.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ... why? Do you have a specific question? Did you
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:55:20AM -0800, Penguin Lover Grant squawked:
> I'm really surprised to hear that. Can I switch my laptop from a
> hardened profile to a non-hardened one? I know I've been told I can't
> do that.
I don't know much about amd64, so I don't know how the 'multilib'
thing wo
>> >> >> I've looked over this:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
>> >> >>
>> >> >> but I'm still not sure if I can choose any of the above.
>> >> >
>> >> > ... why? Do you have a specific question? Did you even bother to try
>> >> > to choose one?
>> >>
>> >> I
>> I'm really surprised to hear that. Can I switch my laptop from a
>> hardened profile to a non-hardened one? I know I've been told I can't
>> do that.
>>
>> You think an 'eselect profile set 2 && emerge -e world' will
>> accomplish the entire thing?
>>
>
> Are you wanting to switch *to* hardene
On Dienstag 23 Dezember 2008, Grant wrote:
> >> >> I've looked over this:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
> >> >>
> >> >> but I'm still not sure if I can choose any of the above.
> >> >
> >> > ... why? Do you have a specific question? Did you even bother to try
>
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 07:55 -0800, Grant wrote:
> I'm really surprised to hear that. Can I switch my laptop from a
> hardened profile to a non-hardened one? I know I've been told I can't
> do that.
>
> You think an 'eselect profile set 2 && emerge -e world' will
> accomplish the entire thing?
>
>> I'm really surprised to hear that. Can I switch my laptop from a
>> hardened profile to a non-hardened one? I know I've been told I can't
>> do that.
>>
>> You think an 'eselect profile set 2 && emerge -e world' will
>> accomplish the entire thing?
>>
>
> Are you wanting to switch *to* hardene
Grant, I've had a similar problem when I installed 2008.0 hardened instead
of the desktop. Here is a link to the post:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-713346.html
I would suggest that after you select your desktop 2008.0 profile to run the
following:
emerge --sync && emerge -uDNav world
--Ri
>> >> I've looked over this:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
>> >>
>> >> but I'm still not sure if I can choose any of the above.
>> >
>> > ... why? Do you have a specific question? Did you even bother to try
>> > to choose one?
>>
>> I read a while back that changin
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 07:28 -0800, Grant wrote:
> >> I've looked over this:
> >>
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
> >>
> >> but I'm still not sure if I can choose any of the above.
> >
> > ... why? Do you have a specific question? Did you even bother to try
> > to choose on
>> I'm getting this:
>>
>> !!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
>> !!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
>> This profile is deprecated. Please update to a 2008.0 profile
>> using eselect profile.
>>
>> and I have:
>>
>> # ls -l /etc/make.profi
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 07:12 -0800, Grant wrote:
> I'm getting this:
>
> !!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
> !!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
> This profile is deprecated. Please update to a 2008.0 profile
> using eselect profile.
>
>
I'm getting this:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
This profile is deprecated. Please update to a 2008.0 profile
using eselect profile.
and I have:
# ls -l /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5
26 matches
Mail list logo
