[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM

2006-12-12 Thread Fredrik Tolf
I just noticed that Gnome 2.16 wants Gamin instead of SGI FAM. I don't, though, since I use NFS and, last I looked, Gamin doesn't support monitoring NFS exports, unlike SGI FAM. Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI FAM with Gnome 2.16, and, if not, how to make

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM

2006-12-12 Thread Thomas Rösner
Fredrik Tolf wrote: I just noticed that Gnome 2.16 wants Gamin instead of SGI FAM. I don't, though, since I use NFS and, last I looked, Gamin doesn't support monitoring NFS exports, unlike SGI FAM. AFAIK it polls. Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI FAM

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM

2006-12-12 Thread Fredrik Tolf
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:09 +0100, Thomas Rösner wrote: Fredrik Tolf wrote: Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI FAM with Gnome 2.16, and, if not, how to make emerge not do that? gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.16.1.ebuild doesnt dep on either of them, and

[gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ] dev-python/pygtk-2.9 (is

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Thomas Rösner
Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ]

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:22:20 +0100 Thomas Rösner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Dale
Thomas Rösner wrote: Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done!

Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:52:18 -0600 Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Rösner wrote: Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be

[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?

2006-09-07 Thread Peter Campion-Bye
I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?

2006-09-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:51:00 +0100 (BST), Peter Campion-Bye wrote: I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=gnome-base shows ebuilds for most of the packages already, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?

2006-09-07 Thread Peter Campion-Bye
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:51:00 +0100 (BST), Peter Campion-Bye wrote: I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=gnome-base shows ebuilds for most of the packages already, but

[gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16

2006-06-02 Thread Ow Mun Heng
Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. -- Cheers, Ow Mun Heng -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16

2006-06-02 Thread Keith Kastorff
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 20:20 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote: Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. Since 2.16 doesn't exist, that seems appropriate. :) -- Keith Kastorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16

2006-06-02 Thread Jeremy Olexa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. Well, According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is the development build. 2.16 doesn't exist, that is probably why its not in

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16

2006-06-02 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:39 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. Well, According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is the

Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16

2006-06-02 Thread Jeremy Olexa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:39 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. Well, According to