Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-05 Thread qfpvajdy
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:01, Thomas Rösner wrote: Nelson wrote: This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge --update world. I have still version 1.4.5. I use x86 (no ~x86). [...] Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ?

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
qfpvajdy wrote: Hello, [...advisory..] Could the maintainer please update to gnupg version 1.4.6? Currently the Gentoo GNU/Linux distribution delivers version 1.4.5. Then how did I get this? Installed versions: 1.4.6 Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\)
-Original Message- From: Thomas Rösner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! qfpvajdy wrote: Hello, [...advisory..] Could the maintainer please update to gnupg

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread kristian
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! -Original Message- From: Thomas Rösner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Graham Murray
Nelson, David (ED, PARD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have it unmasked? My system is ~x86 and I have 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 (I think) but I'm not sure if these are officially the latest stable versions. How did you manage to have both 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 installed at the same time? 2.0.1 has an

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\)
-Original Message- From: Graham Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 January 2007 14:05 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! Nelson, David (ED, PARD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have it unmasked? My system

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 January 2007 15:34, Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote: Do you have it unmasked? My system is ~x86 and I have 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 (I think) but I'm not sure if these are officially the latest stable versions. 1.4.6 is currently marked x86 so any up to date tree will emerge that (unless

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 1/4/07, qfpvajdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm surprised that after several emerge sync and emerge --update world operations since Wed Dec 6 2006, Gentoo has still not upgraded to GnuPG version 1.4.6. It's always helpful if you tell us your arch when you post things like this.

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\)
-Original Message- From: qfpvajdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 January 2007 16:18 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge --update world. I have still

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
qfpvajdy wrote: Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ? Yes. Or use glsa-check. Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
Nelson wrote: This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge --update world. I have still version 1.4.5. I use x86 (no ~x86). [...] Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ? I don't think that's the problem. To my knowledge the -D means update