Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: I have 3.5 as monolithic and 4.0 meta. What concerns me is that adding xcomposite will not re-emerge anything from 4.0 - and there is where I need/want it. OK, I see what you mean. Try this hacked-together list instead: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Gustavo Campos
This should be a nice start: [EMAIL PROTECTED] equery h -p xcomposite [ Searching for USE flag xcomposite in all categories among: ] * installed packages * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [ ] kde-base/kwin-3.5.8 (3.5) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-3.5.9 (3.5) [-P-] [M~] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r1

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: I have 3.5 as monolithic and 4.0 meta. What concerns me is that adding xcomposite will not re-emerge anything from 4.0 - and there is where I need/want it. OK, I see what you mean. Try this

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: Short version: kdelibs krunner kwin libtaskmanager plasma Actually I did that meanwhile. Unfortunately, it doesn't help insofar as the whole session crashes the moment I switch on Enable

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: Short version: kdelibs krunner kwin libtaskmanager plasma Actually I did that meanwhile. Unfortunately, it doesn't help insofar

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:51:42 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: I guess my problem is this: My video subsystem is a VIA UniChrome Pro IGP. I got an X driver for it from www.openchrome.org which doesn't seem to work properly with my IGP version of the chipset. :-( Which version of the driver are you

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: My video subsystem is a VIA UniChrome Pro IGP. Aaahh. Say no more. I can get you good deals on Dell kit. Interested? :-) -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:51:42 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: I guess my problem is this: My video subsystem is a VIA UniChrome Pro IGP. I got an X driver for it from www.openchrome.org which doesn't seem to work properly with my IGP version of the

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: My video subsystem is a VIA UniChrome Pro IGP. Aaahh. Say no more. I can get you good deals on Dell kit. Interested? What do you mean by Dell kit? A whole rig? A DIY kit where I have

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:45 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: Which version of the driver are you using? I have an IGP chipset and use x11-drivers/xf86-video-openchrome-0.2.901 from the Sabayon overlay. I tried 0.2.2 from portage and an svn checkout from openchrome.org. I can't see openchrome

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:15:45 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: Which version of the driver are you using? I have an IGP chipset and use x11-drivers/xf86-video-openchrome-0.2.901 from the Sabayon overlay. I tried 0.2.2 from portage and an svn

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:07:06 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: I tried 0.2.2 from portage and an svn checkout from openchrome.org. I can't see openchrome in portage.http://www.tectonic.co.za/http://www.tectonic.co.za/ Go to x11-drivers/xf86-video-via. Look into the ebuilds. It actually

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:07:06 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: I tried 0.2.2 from portage and an svn checkout from openchrome.org. I can't see openchrome in portage.http://www.tectonic.co.za/http://www.tectonic.co.za/ Go to

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:14:29 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: That looks like Unichrome, the package from which openchrome was forked to add 3D acceleration. The version number, 0.2.2, looks like openchrome to me. Openchrome didn't have versioned releases until 0.2.900. everything was built from

[gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Uwe Thiem
Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite in my xorg. Meanwhile I have found out how to enable composite (and 2D and 3D acceleration) with my graphics chipset. Now I'd like to re-compile KDE with composite enabled. Anybody in the know *what* parts of KDE I have to re-emerge? (Wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Gustavo Campos
Should be enough enable the use flag on your make.conf (xcomposite) and emerge -uvaDN world. Portage will take care of re-compiling only the packages whose USE flag has changed. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite in my xorg. Meanwhile I have found out how to enable composite (and 2D and 3D acceleration) with my graphics chipset. Now I'd like to re-compile KDE with composite enabled. Anybody in the know *what*

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag, 11. März 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite in my xorg. Meanwhile I have found out how to enable composite (and 2D and 3D acceleration) with my graphics chipset. Now I'd like to re-compile KDE with composite enabled. Anybody in the know

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite in my xorg. Meanwhile I have found out how to enable composite (and 2D and 3D acceleration) with my graphics chipset. Now I'd like to re-compile

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: set xcomposite in USE. It'll rebuild a couple of things: Hm ... It will only re-emerge kdebase-3.5.9-r1 here. That doesn't seem

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Jesús Guerrero
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:53:49 +0100 Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: set xcomposite in USE. It'll rebuild a couple of

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: hm, there is no composite use-flag. Are you sure that you have to re-emerge anything? the flag is xcomposite But I would guess: kwin, kdeartwork and maybe that hideous kcontrol-replacement. /me looks around worriedly... /me thinks I've

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite

2008-03-11 Thread Uwe Thiem
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: Hello On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: set xcomposite in USE. It'll rebuild a couple of things: Hm ... It will