On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:56:20 -0700
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
While not a KDE user I echo your thoughts. I'm personally a bit
worried about Gentoo overlords sort of pushing this hald thing with
reasons like 'Gnome's automounting depends on it'.
Where have you got that from? I have
I unmerged all the kde-base/...-4.2.1 pkgs preparatory to remerging them
with USE=kdeprefix it hit me: why am I wasting time on this rubbish ?
KDE 4.2.1 is not -- as someone bluntly pointed out -- a successor to 3.5 :
it's a whole new concept, not yet clear even in the minds of its developers.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I unmerged all the kde-base/...-4.2.1 pkgs preparatory to remerging them
with USE=kdeprefix it hit me: why am I wasting time on this rubbish ?
KDE 4.2.1 is not -- as someone bluntly pointed out -- a successor to 3.5 :
On 14/04/09 Philip Webb said:
I cb content with Fluxbox, if KDE 3.5 disappears one day,
/me hugs fluxbox
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the
On 14/04/09 Mark Knecht said:
While not a KDE user I echo your thoughts. I'm personally a bit
worried about Gentoo overlords sort of pushing this hald thing with
reasons like 'Gnome's automounting depends on it'. If I wanted
automounting that's OK, but what if I don't? Eventually someone will
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 14/04/09 Mark Knecht said:
While not a KDE user I echo your thoughts. I'm personally a bit
worried about Gentoo overlords sort of pushing this hald thing with
reasons like 'Gnome's automounting depends on
6 matches
Mail list logo
