Dale wrote:
>
> OK. This is what it spits out, one after another:
>
>
> kf5.kpackage: No metadata file in the package, expected it at:
>
>
> After that, it repeats the same thing with the path and name of each
> image on the end of the above. The only thing that changes is the file
> name.
>
>
On Saturday, 28 December 2019 15:30:10 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a
On 28/12/19 18:14, Dale wrote:
> I'm pretty much certain you are right. That rings a bell in those cells
> between my ears. It is turned off in make.conf too. I can't recall
> what all that thing did but I remember people not wanting it. I just
> followed a bunch of others on that. Can't be
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 December 2019 18:14:05 GMT Dale wrote:
>>
>> I'm pretty much certain you are right. That rings a bell in those cells
>> between my ears. It is turned off in make.conf too. I can't recall
>> what all that thing did but I remember people not wanting it. I just
>>
On Saturday, 28 December 2019 18:14:05 GMT Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 December 2019 15:30:10 GMT Dale wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 December 2019 15:30:10 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
>> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the
On Saturday, 28 December 2019 15:30:10 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a while.
Maybe later on a fix will come along. Maybe.
>>> What
On Saturday, 28 December 2019 05:57:16 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
> >> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a while.
> >> Maybe later on a fix will come along. Maybe.
> >
> > What happens if you
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a while.
>> Maybe later on a fix will come along. Maybe.
> What happens if you switch off file indexing in the control panel, or just
> its
>
On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 20:42:07 GMT Dale wrote:
> I think I'm just going to have to whittle down the number for a while.
> Maybe later on a fix will come along. Maybe.
What happens if you switch off file indexing in the control panel, or just its
subsidiary option Also Index file
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 24/12/19 22:23, Dale wrote:
>> Wols Lists wrote:
>>> On 24/12/19 20:33, Dale wrote:
I think it is indexing/caching/something that requires it to look at
every single file in there plus all the levels below it. If so, that
would be a huge task. Here is some
On 24/12/19 22:23, Dale wrote:
> Wols Lists wrote:
>> On 24/12/19 20:33, Dale wrote:
>>> I think it is indexing/caching/something that requires it to look at
>>> every single file in there plus all the levels below it. If so, that
>>> would be a huge task. Here is some info on that but I did post
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 24/12/19 20:33, Dale wrote:
>> I think it is indexing/caching/something that requires it to look at
>> every single file in there plus all the levels below it. If so, that
>> would be a huge task. Here is some info on that but I did post it a bit
>> ago. It was sort of
On 24/12/19 20:33, Dale wrote:
> I think it is indexing/caching/something that requires it to look at
> every single file in there plus all the levels below it. If so, that
> would be a huge task. Here is some info on that but I did post it a bit
> ago. It was sort of nested in one of the posts.
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 24/12/19 18:35, Dale wrote:
>> I'll try to see if I can get the actual error here in a bit, either a
>> picture or the actual text. I only need one line because it is the same
>> for them all except the name and path of the file.
> I've just had an idea ...
>
> I think it
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:35:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
My temporary solution, I pointed it to a small directory that only
has a couple dozen images in it. That seems to work.
>>> Is there a difference in the metadata of these few images compared
>>> with the rest in
Wols Lists wrote:
> On 24/12/19 18:35, Dale wrote:
>> I'll try to see if I can get the actual error here in a bit, either a
>> picture or the actual text. I only need one line because it is the same
>> for them all except the name and path of the file.
> I've just had an idea ...
>
> I think it
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 06:40:13 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I have them all in a directory named, wait for
>> it, wallpapers. Under that they are sorted in directories by what they
>> are, where they come from or whatever. I try not to go to deep but it
>> does pick up at
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:35:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> My temporary solution, I pointed it to a small directory that only
> >> has a couple dozen images in it. That seems to work.
> > Is there a difference in the metadata of these few images compared
> > with the rest in the whole directory?
>
On 24/12/19 18:35, Dale wrote:
> I'll try to see if I can get the actual error here in a bit, either a
> picture or the actual text. I only need one line because it is the same
> for them all except the name and path of the file.
I've just had an idea ...
I think it was on LWN they were
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 06:40:13 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> It seems plasmashell and wallpapers for the desktop has a problem. I'm
>> not sure if it is just me or if it could affect others. Either way, I
>> have no idea how to fix it. I have a LOT of wallpapers that I've
On 24/12/19 09:53, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 06:40:13 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> It seems plasmashell and wallpapers for the desktop has a problem. I'm
>> not sure if it is just me or if it could affect others. Either way, I
>> have no idea how to fix it. I have a LOT of
On Tuesday, December 24, 2019 10:53:13 AM CET Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 06:40:13 GMT Dale wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > It seems plasmashell and wallpapers for the desktop has a problem. I'm
> > not sure if it is just me or if it could affect others. Either way, I
> > have no idea
On Tuesday, 24 December 2019 06:40:13 GMT Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> It seems plasmashell and wallpapers for the desktop has a problem. I'm
> not sure if it is just me or if it could affect others. Either way, I
> have no idea how to fix it. I have a LOT of wallpapers that I've
>
Howdy,
It seems plasmashell and wallpapers for the desktop has a problem. I'm
not sure if it is just me or if it could affect others. Either way, I
have no idea how to fix it. I have a LOT of wallpapers that I've
downloaded/collected over the years. Some are NASA pics of Mars, stars,
galaxies
26 matches
Mail list logo
