Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010, Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I wonder whether this
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If your system is slow maybe from managing all that unusued memory. ;-)
Al
Al wrote:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If your system is slow maybe from managing all that unusued memory. ;-)
Al
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:37 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Al did
opine thusly:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If
Alan McKinnon writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian Philipp did opine thusly:
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I
Am 18.09.2010 22:19, schrieb Alex Schuster:
[...]
I used to restart kdm once per day in order to free memory. If I did not
do this, KDE4 became nearly unsusabe.
Yeah, logout - logon seems to resolve my problem temporarily, as well.
Now this looks different here. I have X with 946M,
Am 19.09.2010 13:34, schrieb Alex Schuster:
Alan McKinnon writes:
Like I posted in another thread today, the memory columns in top do not
mean what most people think they mean, nor are they simplistic.
You gave the example of Thunderbird using 150M and Firefox 180M, but
together they would
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:34 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Alex
Schuster did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian Philipp did opine thusly:
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats
Am 19.09.2010 10:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
[...]
Like I posted in another thread today, the memory columns in top do not mean
what most people think they mean, nor are they simplistic.
The columns tell you the amount of memory that process can access. This is
vitally important to
On Saturday 18 September 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
Okay, I'm used to Firefox taking much memory. I'm okay with that since
it's the most heavily used application currently running. But why does
Akregator need that much memory? It doesn't even have any tabs open at
the moment and is just
Actually, the 3588 is what is used. The 165 is what is free. Maybe the
email program you are using is not lining the columns up properly.
Maybe you are right. Headers out of alignment.
Al
ok first of .. i dont run my comp (laptop) for that long, although i am
planning to start using hibernate. its usually up the whole day though.
secondly im on kde4.5.1 (but i dont remeber having such bad memory problems
with the version your running).
Krunner's neopomuk plugin leaks memory,
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I wonder whether this is expected behavior.
The following statistics have been taken after 8 days of uptime during
which the system
Florian Philipp writes:
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I wonder whether this is expected behavior.
I was just about to write something about this. I suffered from bad
14 matches
Mail list logo
