On Sunday 16 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 18:36 Sun 16 Dec , Mick wrote:
On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
On 22:11 Mon 17 Dec , Mick wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
OK then, I have been using CFQ for the last few days and it 'feels' slower
(when e.g. I fire up Kmail, Opera and aterm in quick succession) relative to
anticipatory which I was using before.
--
On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for
On 18:36 Sun 16 Dec , Mick wrote:
On Saturday 15 December 2007, forgottenwizard wrote:
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is
On 15:27 Thu 13 Dec , Jason Carson wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:39:11 -0500
Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably want to use CFQ as it is currently the fastest
It is? I though anticipatory was still considered the fastest.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Dec 13, 2007 3:27 PM, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL
071213 Jason Carson wrote:
Where in 'make menuconfig' do I find the choice for schedulers.
The one I am currently using is Anticipatory.
What is the newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Try '/sched', which will get you started lead you to
'Enable block layer - IO Schedulers - whatever you
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server.
On Dec 13, 2007 3:57 PM, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
The article is very old, take a look at this, newer one:
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/008jun05/features/schedulers/
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server,
On Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for
17 matches
Mail list logo
