On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:42:25 +0100, Digby Tarvin wrote:
Thats what wasn't clear to me. I assume this is a special case in that
an 'update world' won't install new kernel sources by default?
It will, provided the existing kernel sources were emerged. Portage only
tracks software installed by
Digby Tarvin schreef:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:25:52PM -0400, James Hiscock wrote:
I gather one cannot just copy the .config file for this much of a
jump, so I guess the best thing to do is a simultaneous 'make
menuconfig' in both old and new kernel using two different
windows so that I
As I am going from 2.6.10-gentoo-r6 to 2.6.12-gentoo-r10, which is more
than just a revision change, it would seen that 'make oldconfig' is not
recomended.
Recommendations are just that: recommendations. You can take them or
leave them. :)
And I have to agree with Holly on this one: it's a
The portage system seems pretty effective in keeping the user level
code up to date on a gentoo system - but now that I have had my
system installed for 6-7 months it has occured to me that my
kernel is no longer current, and I havn't found anything in the
handbook suggesting how this should be
On 10/27/05, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The portage system seems pretty effective in keeping the user level
code up to date on a gentoo system - but now that I have had my
system installed for 6-7 months it has occured to me that my
kernel is no longer current, and I havn't found
Thanks, but I am ok on configuring the kernels and then installing
them in /boot.
The thing which isn't clear to me is how I should get the 'linux-new_version'
directory installed on my system without downloading a whole new install
image and copying it across manually?
Is there a kernel release
On Thursday 27 October 2005 14:25, Digby Tarvin wrote:
Thanks, but I am ok on configuring the kernels and then installing
them in /boot.
The thing which isn't clear to me is how I should get the
'linux-new_version' directory installed on my system without downloading a
whole new install
On 10/27/05, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I am ok on configuring the kernels and then installing
them in /boot.
The thing which isn't clear to me is how I should get the 'linux-new_version'
directory installed on my system without downloading a whole new install
image
P.S. See my other posts regarding trying to get USB to work for
my mobile for the inspiration behind wanting to update the kernel.
I think if you get to the stage of having to debug kernel code, it
is always worth at least trying the latest kernel first.
Regards,
DigbyT
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at
Thanks,
Thats what wasn't clear to me. I assume this is a special case in that
an 'update world' won't install new kernel sources by default?
I assume that the separate kernel source trees means that a new
kernel can be build in parallel to an older one, and the active
kernel chosen at boot
On 10/27/05, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
Thats what wasn't clear to me. I assume this is a special case in that
an 'update world' won't install new kernel sources by default?
emerge --update world should install the new kernel sources for you.
Did you do a emerge --sync? If
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:43:07 +0100 Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The portage system seems pretty effective in keeping the user level
code up to date on a gentoo system - but now that I have had my
system installed for 6-7 months it has occured to me that my
kernel is no longer current,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:45:49AM +0200, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:43:07 +0100 Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The portage system seems pretty effective in keeping the user level
code up to date on a gentoo system - but now that I have had my
system installed for
I gather one cannot just copy the .config file for this much of a jump,
so I guess the best thing to do is a simultaneous 'make menuconfig' in both
old and new kernel using two different windows so that I can be sure
to copy each of the current settings across.
Easier solution: copy the
On 10/28/05, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:45:49AM +0200, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:43:07 +0100 Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The portage system seems pretty effective in keeping the user level
code up to date on a gentoo
Thanks James and Qian,
But doesn't this conflict with the advice given in kernel-upgrade.xml, which
says:
The only situation where this is appropriate is when upgrading from one Gentoo
kernel revision to another. For example, the changes made between
gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r1 and
16 matches
Mail list logo
