On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 14:54 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/7/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
getenv( _ );
Well, that is set by bash before it exec's anything, so that should
work, provided the program[s] are always exec'd by bash and not by
something else. It would
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I don't have just one main.c, I have 20+ different apps, each with
their own main.c, which I don't maintain, for which I'd have to issue
Ah, ok, sorry, I missed that part.
So, can I ask /why/ you need the process name in this class?
On 07 July 2006 18:14, Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I don't have just one main.c, I have 20+ different apps, each with
their own main.c, which I don't maintain, for which I'd have to issue
Ah, ok, sorry, I missed that part.
So, can I ask /why/
On 7/7/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
getenv( _ );
Well, that is set by bash before it exec's anything, so that should
work, provided the program[s] are always exec'd by bash and not by
something else. It would be nicer if _ was set by the kernel, or
even glibc.
-Richard
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone mentioned that /proc is deprecated for 2.6? is this correct? Is
there a /sys alternative to /proc/self/status?
Oh, I don't think /proc itself is deprecated. After all, ps, pstree,
top and so on still use it. And it is not mentioned
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 10:17 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 16:01 +0200, Petr Uzel wrote:
file /proc/self/status is a link pointing to the
directory /proc/pid_of_process. And by parsing status file in this
directory
you should get all the informations you want.
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone mentioned that /proc is deprecated for 2.6? is this correct? Is
there a /sys alternative to /proc/self/status?
Again, I *highly* suggest doing the standard, cross-platform, and
most-efficient thing, which is to just store off the
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:55 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone mentioned that /proc is deprecated for 2.6? is this correct? Is
there a /sys alternative to /proc/self/status?
Again, I *highly* suggest doing the standard, cross-platform, and
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I would, except that I'm editing a class which is inherited by a
multitude of programs, so the /proc way I only have to change one file,
whereas the argv[0] way I have to change every source file...
No, that's the point of a global.
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:48 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/6/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I would, except that I'm editing a class which is inherited by a
multitude of programs, so the /proc way I only have to change one file,
whereas the argv[0] way I have to change
Dne středa 28 červen 2006 15:04 Iain Buchanan napsal(a):
Hi again :)
I have been googling for this one for a little while, and trying various
options, but I can't seem to find it: How do I get the process from
within a process in c or c++?
I don't want to use argv[0], because the
Dne středa 28 červen 2006 15:51 Petr Uzel napsal(a):
Dne středa 28 červen 2006 15:04 Iain Buchanan napsal(a):
Hi again :)
I have been googling for this one for a little while, and trying various
options, but I can't seem to find it: How do I get the process from
within a process in c
On 6/28/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to use argv[0], because the particular place is deep within
classes, and there are too many (I'm doing some porting) to edit all of
their constructors, for example, to pass argv[0].
The normal way of handling this is with a global
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 16:01 +0200, Petr Uzel wrote:
Dne středa 28 červen 2006 15:51 Petr Uzel napsal(a):
Dne středa 28 červen 2006 15:04 Iain Buchanan napsal(a):
Hi again :)
I have been googling for this one for a little while, and trying various
options, but I can't seem to find
14 matches
Mail list logo
