Daniel Pielmeier schrieb am 23.02.19 um 16:37:
> Daniel Pielmeier schrieb am 23.02.19 um 16:25:
>> Holger Hoffstätte schrieb am 23.02.19 um 15:15:
>>>
>>> Last night openrc was updated to ~0.41, supposedly fixing [1].
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it seems it had the opposite effect and made things worse
Daniel Pielmeier schrieb am 23.02.19 um 16:25:
> Holger Hoffstätte schrieb am 23.02.19 um 15:15:
>>
>> Last night openrc was updated to ~0.41, supposedly fixing [1].
>>
>> Unfortunately it seems it had the opposite effect and made things worse
>> compared to the previous 0.42.3 - the deptree is
Holger Hoffstätte schrieb am 23.02.19 um 15:15:
>
> Last night openrc was updated to ~0.41, supposedly fixing [1].
>
> Unfortunately it seems it had the opposite effect and made things worse
> compared to the previous 0.42.3 - the deptree is broken, rc-status
> remains confused and a reboot
Last night openrc was updated to ~0.41, supposedly fixing [1].
Unfortunately it seems it had the opposite effect and made things worse
compared to the previous 0.42.3 - the deptree is broken, rc-status
remains confused and a reboot results in a read-only root fs because
(I think) the runlevels
4 matches
Mail list logo