On 2020-04-23 14:35, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
* setting priority of your layman repo below -1000.
I think this is the hot ticket here. That way poly-c becomes... an
underlay, I guess? It will suit my needs and it only affects this one *lay.
I figured this was an "RTFM" type of
On 23 April 2020 22:00:50 CEST, tastytea wrote:
>On 2020-04-23T21:39+0200
>"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> On 23 April 2020 21:35:22 CEST, Caveman Al Toraboran
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I would prefer that portage prioritize gentoo's version rather
>> >> than the overlay's version, unless specified
On 2020-04-23T21:39+0200
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On 23 April 2020 21:35:22 CEST, Caveman Al Toraboran
> wrote:
> >
> >> I would prefer that portage prioritize gentoo's version rather
> >> than the overlay's version, unless specified otherwise (eg.
> >> sys-boot/grub::poly-c) when installing.
>
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 11:09 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail)
wrote:
> Looking for some guidance in managing the source of package
> installs/upgrades when a package is provided by both the standard
> repository and an overlay.
>
> I currently have the poly-c overlay added via layman. poly-c
On 23 April 2020 21:35:22 CEST, Caveman Al Toraboran
wrote:
>
>On Thursday, April 23, 2020 11:09 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail)
> wrote:
>
>> Looking for some guidance in managing the source of package
>> installs/upgrades when a package is provided by both the standard
>> repository and an overlay.
Looking for some guidance in managing the source of package
installs/upgrades when a package is provided by both the standard
repository and an overlay.
I currently have the poly-c overlay added via layman. poly-c provides
many of the same packages as the standard gentoo repository.
When I
6 matches
Mail list logo
