-Original Message-
From: CTI Corporativo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:19 PM
To: Jason Ausmus
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting a package in package.keywords?
HOLA:
NO RECIBI TU MAIL YA QUE ESTA CASILLA ESTA DESACTIVADA
(ESTO ES UNA
Am I the only person getting these emails?
Not any more.
pgpjwgktqDQvL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jason Ausmus wrote:
Am I the only person getting these emails?
Nope, I just got one as well...
--
Randy Barlow
http://www.electronsweatshop.com
Oh me of little faith...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:30:43 -0800, Jason Ausmus wrote:
-Original Message-
From: CTI Corporativo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I the only person getting these emails?
No, and we're both going to get another one now. You get one each time you
post to the list - think of it as a
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Jason Ausmus wrote:
Am I the only person getting these emails?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158247
--
Bo Andresen
pgpzlchihkaRB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 14 December 2006 00:45, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:55:52 -0800, Jason Ausmus wrote:
the latest ivtv branch (irregardless of whether its marked
stable).
snip
Sorry, but irregardless != English word
I'm not trying to deputize myself as a grammar police
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:13:31 +, Mick wrote:
I guess that's a bit like the infamous cake-walk phrase in reference
to the TV announcements made at the time of the recent Iraq invasion?
It left me wondering whether they intended to say piece of cake or a
walk in the park. I guess they were
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:46 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting a package in package.keywords?
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:55:52 -0800, Jason Ausmus wrote
I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
/etc/portage/package.keywords as media-tv/ivtv. Now I'd like to
have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
version is required as a dependency of some other program.
I thought that putting =media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0 (where 0.9.0 is
Travis Osterman wrote:
I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
/etc/portage/package.keywords as media-tv/ivtv. Now I'd like to
have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
version is required as a dependency of some other program.
I thought that putting
If you wanted to do something like that, and make all 0.9.x versions
stable in package.keywords, then you would add this:
=media-tv/ivtv-0.9*
But if you just want to stick with 0.9.0, then what you had before is
correct.
=media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0
Excellent, I put both
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:59, Travis Osterman wrote:
I needed to unmask ivtv by placing it in my
/etc/portage/package.keywords as media-tv/ivtv. Now I'd like to
have my system not ask me to ever upgrade it again until the newer
version is required as a dependency of some other program.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:46:40 -0500, Travis Osterman wrote:
Excellent, I put both =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r1 and
=media-tv/ivtv-0.9.0 in my package.keywords and now I can emerge
world without worry.
You are probably better off with ~sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19
which will allow
-Original Message-
From: Steve Dibb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:14 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Protecting a package in package.keywords?
Travis Osterman wrote:
snip
Technically, you're going
to be best off
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:55:52 -0800, Jason Ausmus wrote:
the latest ivtv branch (irregardless of whether its marked
stable).
snip
Sorry, but irregardless != English word
I'm not trying to deputize myself as a grammar police officer, but I'm
powerless to resist this one...
Try
15 matches
Mail list logo
