Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Questions about building from source tarball

2012-11-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 23:33:44 -0400, David Relson wrote: 1) create directory /usr/local/portage/app-example/some-package 2) copy some-package.x.y.z.ebuild to some-package.x.y.z-r1.ebuild (in the new directory). 3) Some editing of the new ebuild might be needed here... Some files in the files

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Questions about building from source tarball

2012-11-01 Thread David Relson
In the past when I wanted/needed a newer version of a package than is in portage, I'd create an entry in /usr/local/portage. For example for app-example/some-package/some-package.x.y.z.ebuild, I'd 1) create directory /usr/local/portage/app-example/some-package 2) copy some-package.x.y.z.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Questions about building from source tarball

2012-10-31 Thread Walter Dnes
Thanks for the pointer. It got me going... sort of. Now I know why we don't have the latest seamonkey in the Gentoo tree. It requires =dev-libs/nspr-4.9.3 and the highest ebuild of nspr in the tree is 4.9.2, even though I did an emerge sync today. So I'd have to build nspr and nss locally

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Questions about building from source tarball

2012-10-30 Thread walt
On 10/30/2012 01:56 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: Several years ago, back in the days of Mozilla 0.9x and Phoenix, I used to build Mozilla and/or Pheonix from the source tarball. Me too :) Every morning I'd pull from their source repo and build my own and then file bug reports (there were