[gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-21 Thread Lie Ryan
On 09/19/10 18:08, Alan McKinnon wrote: Firefox 4 indeed is smoother (probably due to the new animations, probably because none of the plugins I used are compatible yet, but maybe it is just faster); but it is definitely more memory hungrier than before. In Fx3, it usually took around ~20-25%

[gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-21 Thread Lie Ryan
On 09/19/10 19:04, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan did opine thusly: On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-21 Thread Dale
Lie Ryan wrote: On 09/19/10 19:04, Dale wrote: Yep. I use Seamonkey which is browser and email all in one. It doesn't use much when I first start it up. The amount it accumulates as time goes on depends on the websites I go to. If I go to sites that have a lot of flash, pictures and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-20 Thread Thomas Yao
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, me poiso...@gmail.com wrote: Chrome's set of extensions is growing rather large, and at least contains most of what anyone would need, a bit short of 'want', but covers needs fairly well. If you don't like chrome's interface I'll not argue, but if the

[gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Francesco Talamona
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable. I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons (xmarks, AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. Seg fault sometimes. I've got

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote: On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Is it just me?  Or does Firefox get slower every release?  And less stable. I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons (xmarks,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan did opine thusly: On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan did opine thusly: On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread me
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote: On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Is it just me?  Or does Firefox get slower every release?  And less stable.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Mick
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote: On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Is it just me? Or

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread András Csányi
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86.  I tried Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster.  I gave up on it because I was not sure if the browser was calling home with my browsing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread a...@sourcegarden.de
On 09/19/10 19:26, András Csányi wrote: On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up on it because I was not sure if the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread me
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote: On

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Mick
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:56:36 me wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-19 Thread Mick
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:26:56 András Csányi wrote: On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up on it because I

[gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-18 Thread walt
On 09/18/2010 03:14 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable. I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons (xmarks, AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing. Seg fault sometimes. I've got ECC

[gentoo-user] Re: Fire the fox.

2010-09-18 Thread Lie Ryan
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable. Indeed. But FF4 is *much* faster. And much more stable. At least, that was my experience when I tried it