On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 04:25 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > that excessively long qt package
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> rid of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags.
I got rid of it by switching to a flatpak version of the singular
desktop
On Monday, 10 July 2023 02:25:43 BST Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
> > that excessively long qt package
>
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get rid
> of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world update, a
> depclean
On Monday, 10 July 2023 04:45:52 BST Dale wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
> >> that excessively long qt package
> >
> > Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> > rid of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world
>
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
>> that excessively long qt package
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> rid of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world
> update, a depclean should then remove it from the system.
>
>
On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
that excessively long qt package
Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get rid
of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world update, a
depclean should then remove it from the system.
You might have to juggle a few
5 matches
Mail list logo
