suggest and post back. Do you think btrfs (with or without compression)
would be faster than reiser? If so I will try that as well.
On my system it is twice as fast as reiser3 for _lots_ (200.000) of
small files with compression on (didn't test is without compression). I
didn't test if with
On 10/07/2010 12:59 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
WOW! Those differences are crazy!
Please - I know benchmarking takes a lot of time - but could you check
something: the behavior those fs have at what time they flush data from
cache to disk is very different. Have you made sure that
FYI some braindead benchmarking, reiserfs vs ext4, kernel 2.6.35-gentoo-r8
Copy same DVD image from internal reiserfs drive to freshly formatted
external drive;
reiserfs1m37.530s
ext43m15.074s
Then image copy on that external drive;
# time cp CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso
On 10/06/2010 10:04 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
FYI some braindead benchmarking, reiserfs vs ext4, kernel 2.6.35-gentoo-r8
Copy same DVD image from internal reiserfs drive to freshly formatted
external drive;
reiserfs1m37.530s
ext43m15.074s
Then image copy on that external drive;
WOW! Those differences are crazy!
Please - I know benchmarking takes a lot of time - but could you check
something: the behavior those fs have at what time they flush data from
cache to disk is very different. Have you made sure that you measured
the time it really needs? I mean the
On 10/01/2010 04:40 PM, James wrote:
Daniel Troeder daniel at admin-box.com writes:
As I read about the nice performance of btrfs with compression I tried
it out two weeks ago. I'll be posting my benchmarks to this list soon.
Until now I didn't have any problems, but still would not use
Daniel Troeder daniel at admin-box.com writes:
$ mkfs.btrfs /dev/xyz
To use compression, just mount with -o compress.
/etc/fstab:
/dev/mapper/vg0-portage /gentoo btrfs noatime,compress 0 2
I installed sys-fs/btrfs-progs-0.19-r1 and I have the 'acl' flag on.
Fair enough,
thanks
James
Daniel Troeder daniel at admin-box.com writes:
As I read about the nice performance of btrfs with compression I tried
it out two weeks ago. I'll be posting my benchmarks to this list soon.
Until now I didn't have any problems, but still would not use btrfs on
production systems.
What
Adam Carter adamcarter3 at gmail.com writes:
Taring my mp3 collection from 2.5in 500MB internal sata drive
(sda) to esata 3.5in 500MB drive (sdb) and it seems slow.
Well, there are multiple avenues to nail down your specific issues,
most documented or hinted at in the archives of this
On 09/30/2010 07:00 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2010 14:10:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
An HDD gets slower when you read the inner tracks. The angular
velocity is constant (5400 RPM) while the tangential velocity gets
lower with the radius.
Are you telling us that the
10 matches
Mail list logo
