Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:36:50 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I've read that dd actually has problems reading from cdroms and isos
produced with something like dd if=/dev/cdrom of=my.iso conv=noerror
would be invalid. Can anyone confirm / deny,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:
I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same
result and are faster.
dd is not slower than cp/cat if you increase the block size from the
default 512 bytes.
Increasing the block size does make it /almost/ as
On 12/15/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote: I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same result and are faster. dd is not slower than cp/cat if you increase the block size from the
default 512 bytes.Aside
On 15 December 2005 23:56, Hani Duwaik wrote:
On 12/15/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:
I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same
result and are faster.
dd is not slower than cp/cat if
4 matches
Mail list logo
