On 2023-05-15, Dan Johansson wrote:
> On 15.05.23 16:41, Matt Connell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 16:24 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
>>> RuntimeError: OpenPGP signature not found on Manifest
>>
>> It sounds like your sync is hitting a mirror that is currently broken.
>>
>> Are you using a
On domenica 21 luglio 2019 13:22:55 CEST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> On domenica 21 luglio 2019 12:44:14 CEST Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday, 21 July 2019 11:17:30 BST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > > On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 21:02:40 CEST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > > > On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 18:21:46 CEST
On domenica 21 luglio 2019 12:44:14 CEST Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 21 July 2019 11:17:30 BST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 21:02:40 CEST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > > On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 18:21:46 CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > On 2019-07-18 19:42, Stefano Crocco wrote:
On Sunday, 21 July 2019 11:17:30 BST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 21:02:40 CEST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 18:21:46 CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On 2019-07-18 19:42, Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > > > Hello to everyone,
> > > > since yesterday emerge
On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 21:02:40 CEST Stefano Crocco wrote:
> On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 18:21:46 CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2019-07-18 19:42, Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > > Hello to everyone,
> > > since yesterday emerge --sync fails because it can't refresh keys. The
> > > messages I get
On venerdì 19 luglio 2019 18:21:46 CEST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2019-07-18 19:42, Stefano Crocco wrote:
> > Hello to everyone,
> > since yesterday emerge --sync fails because it can't refresh keys. The
> > messages I get are:
> >
> > Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/usr/portage'...
> >
> >
On 2019-07-18 19:42, Stefano Crocco wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
> since yesterday emerge --sync fails because it can't refresh keys. The
> messages I get are:
>
> Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/usr/portage'...
> * Using keys from /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc
> * Refreshing
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 17:19:42 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Mick wrote :
> > I can't recall the OP mentioning corrupt data, which is
> > usually the first thing observed with faulty memory.
>
> I did, actually, last Friday.
Oops! My mistake.
> Numbers of files in the portage tree
Mick wrote :
> I can't recall the OP mentioning corrupt data, which is
> usually the first thing observed with faulty memory.
I did, actually, last Friday. Numbers of files in the portage tree suddenly
changed owner (or group), and when I fixed that git complained that my numerous
local
Grant Edwards wrote :
> Perhaps it's already been mentioned, but failing RAM can cause all
> sorts failures that might appear to be failing disks, failing network
> cards, failing video cards whatever. I'd run memtest86 for at least
> 12 hours just to make sure...
Good idea. I'll try that.
--
On Thursday, 7 March 2019 14:45:31 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:29 AM Grant Edwards
wrote:
> > On 2019-03-07, Mick wrote:
> > > I can think of 3 things, but more learned M/L contributors may add to
> > > these:
> > >
> > > 1. The SATA connection has come loose. With time
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:29 AM Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-07, Mick wrote:
>
> > I can think of 3 things, but more learned M/L contributors may add to these:
> >
> > 1. The SATA connection has come loose. With time and movement it can come
> > (slightly) adrift. Pushing it back in
On 2019-03-07, Mick wrote:
> I can think of 3 things, but more learned M/L contributors may add to these:
>
> 1. The SATA connection has come loose. With time and movement it can come
> (slightly) adrift. Pushing it back in fully fixes this problem - also see No.
> 2 below.
>
> 2. The
On 161024-22:27+0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think
> > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not
> > storing files twice.
>
> Because I have several host
On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think
> that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not
> storing files twice.
Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one.
--
alarig
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
> I use a similar setup for LXC containers running over a gentoo box,
> except that my box is setted up to publish the binary packets on a
> specified directory that is accessible via HTTP. My LXCs take the binary
>
On Mon Oct 24 10:44:24 2016, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> My use case is basic: 2 home computers, I do emerge et. al. on the
> faster one and produce binary packages to be used on the other one,
> which doesn't even need distfiles, just portage tree plus binary
> packages. I copy stuff between boxes
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But a more elegant solution is to emerge
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
> wrote:
>>
>> But a more elegant solution is to emerge app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror and
>> setup your own rsync mirror.
>>
>
> Sure, but it
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>> Jorge Almeida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
>>>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
>> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe?
>
> Yes, although ...
>
>> does emerge --sync just updates the
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe?
Yes, although ...
> does emerge --sync just updates the contents of /usr/portage
portage also changes the content of /var/cache/edb, and in
On 10/24/2011 02:40 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Greetings,
emerge --sync was successfull till 'Performing Global Updates' which
leaded to an error. After waiting for perhaps 1 to 2 hours i tried
another 'emerge --sync' in the hope that would fix the issue. No luck.
---
i5 hafi #
Nikos Chantziaras:
On 10/24/2011 02:40 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
i5 hafi # emerge --sync
[...]
ERROR: Malformed update entry 'move dev-php5/dev-php5/pecl-ssh2
dev-php/dev-php5/pecl-ssh2'
For future reference, instead of deleting (which can be a bad idea since
new ebuilds can depend on
On 10/25/2011 12:21 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras:
On 10/24/2011 02:40 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
i5 hafi # emerge --sync
[...]
ERROR: Malformed update entry 'move dev-php5/dev-php5/pecl-ssh2
dev-php/dev-php5/pecl-ssh2'
For future reference, instead of deleting (which can be
Albert W. Hopkins:
You should be able to delete /usr/portage/profiles/updates/4Q-2011 (or
edit the file and fix it... it's pretty straighforward) and continue
from there.
Done the edit. Works. Thanks.
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
Thanks NIck and AllenJB
I just wanted kde-4.2 like in: hey! I want kde 4.2 and I want it
right now! :-)
Anyway, I already have it.
Richard Fish wrote:
On 1/18/06, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be the ultimate dumb question, but no amount of googling could
satisfy my ignorance...
Is there any difference? If not, why are the double hyphens almost
always specified?
-- is the GNU getopt syntax for long
-opt is processed as 6 options ('o', 'p', and 't').
s/6/3/g
eh?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 1/19/06, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--sync is correct. -sync is wrong and generates an error.
Ahem... not for me it didn't... thats why I asked - wondered if I may
What versions of portage python (emerge -pv portage python)?
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 1/19/06, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-opt is processed as 6 options ('o', 'p', and 't').
s/6/3/g
eh?
It is 'sed' syntax. In english:
replace all ocurrences of the pattern '6' with the string '3'.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Charles Marcus wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 1/18/06, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be the ultimate dumb question, but no amount of googling could
satisfy my ignorance...
Is there any difference? If not, why are the double hyphens almost
always specified?
-- is the GNU
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:39:48 -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
Now, why did it not generate an error for me, I wonder?
Maybe you're thinking of emerge sync:
$ emerge -sync
!!! Error: -y is an invalid short action or option.
Same here. emerge -sync is the same as emerge -s -y -n -c.
--
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:35:03 +0100, ddup1 wrote:
hi
why emerge sync is sometime very long, at the step update portage cache,
sometime it takes 1mn and sometime lot longer ?
Portage problem. Will be better next release I hear. Search the forums and
search the newsgroup for portage, metadata,
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: 06 January 2006 10:40
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge sync
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:35:03 +0100, ddup1 wrote:
hi
why emerge sync is sometime very long
36 matches
Mail list logo