[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/15/2012 07:05 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Greetings, on my x86_64 libreoffice fails to detect Java. I am getting this when starting lowriter: hafi@i5_64 ~ $ lowriter Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not fuction correctly Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: On 01/15/2012 07:05 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: on my x86_64 libreoffice fails to detect Java. I am getting this when starting lowriter: hafi@i5_64 ~ $ lowriter Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not fuction correctly Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R]

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/16/2012 04:12 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: There is a difference to my x86_64 Gentoo that *may* be important x86:64: Available Java Virtual Machines: [1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm i686: Available Java Virtual Machines: [1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm user-vm On i686 there is not

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: I never had user-vm set until just now. It made no difference AFAICT. I am not seeing a difference also. It seems that your java environment is somehow broken, but I don't know why. Some part of libreoffice thinks that javaldx is available when it's not. What does java -version say?

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/16/2012 10:15 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: The shotgun approach may work :) Would have been nice if it worked. But unfortunately... *g* Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :) When faced with something as complex as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try running it from there,

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :) When faced with something as complex as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try running it from there, to rule out breakage in my home directory. Fine to know about this. :) But... ;) I could try the unstable sun-jdk. I could try an old

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread James Broadhead
On 16 January 2012 19:51, Hartmut Figge h.fi...@gmx.de wrote: walt: Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :)  When faced with something as complex as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try running it from there, to rule out breakage in my home directory. Fine to know about this. :)

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
James Broadhead: [libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1] It's actually looking for java-1.7 ; but seems to work fine with 1.6 Tcha. Not here. icedtea-bin-1.10.4 isn't found by libreoffice either. Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von Usern fuer User :-)