On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which
I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother
fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt. Good
Harry Putnam wrote:
Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu
item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem
to imply.
You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo.
So do you see the same problem with the `run' item on main
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to
the question.
OK, if that
Harry Putnam wrote:
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to
the
Raffaele BELARDI raffaele.bela...@st.com writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu
item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem
to imply.
You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo.
So do
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
For your information: Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane
group from Jonathan Thibault jonat...@navigue.com.
Whoops forgot to attach Jonathan's message:
From nobody Wed Dec 17 12:33:39 2014
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jonathan
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
What was supposed to be attached again? ;-)
Dale
hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the
attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments
are allowed...
Here is it is inline:
--- ---
Harry Putnam wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
What was supposed to be attached again? ;-)
Dale
hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the
attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments
are allowed...
Here is it is inline:
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
After installing piles of X related pkgs including all the lxde pkgs:
Any ideas?
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/
[2] http://lxqt.org/
You may want
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
You may want to read the entire bug there on the remaining
issues with lxqt-8. From what I gather there are problems
upgradeing an existing lxde setup; but installing lxqt 8.0 or
1.0 as a fresh install is working for most. ymmv.
Oops,
Forgot the
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/
[2] http://lxqt.org/
LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people
who also developed LXDE. [3]
When pressing the all important `run'
Michael Vetter michael.vetter at uni-konstanz.de writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people
who also developed LXDE. [3]
Yes, the tenor has changed over the months to keep the base of users in tact.
But, if you read the
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to the question.
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to
the question.
OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com writes:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
lxde is deprecated, imho. [1]
lxqt is the future of that lineage [2]
Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to
the question.
OK, if that
15 matches
Mail list logo
