On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
but find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the
level of
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just go 4x4 :D 16 CPU's and 128G of ram drool
Dale wrote:
| Neil Bothwick wrote:
| On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:39 +0100, KH wrote:
|
|
| only thing I found out until now is that flash is not working. Maybe
| this is fixed by now.
|
|
| Install
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:07 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:07 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 14 March 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an
AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower
with one or the other.
Simple logic dictates that 32 and 64 apps will *generally* run at
exactly the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knecht wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an
| AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower
| with one
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:45:21 +
Filipe Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few numbers from genlop -t
Thanks much! This was interesting for me to read. I am surprised by
how much faster 64bit system was for compiling these things.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Filipe Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knecht wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knecht wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Filipe Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Nice numbers and nice machine. Must have set you back a bit. ;-)
this machine was built by me just for gentoo.
| It seems when I match up exact revisions
* Jamie Dobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu but
find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level of
customization that I can do with it.
wb :)
However, I do have a few worries - why has there been no
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 12:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Amar Cosic wrote:
There should be gentoo-chat list
There is one. We call it gentoo-user.
It's a rite-of-passage thing. When you figure out the *real* purpose of
gentoo-user, then we let you into the inner
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 04:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in all.
Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
brag I just installed Gentoo on a quad-core dual-cpu Xeon E5420
(2.50GHz). 8Gb RAM, 800Gb raid. It's not mine -
Hi Iain,
on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:53:40PM +0930, you wrote:
brag I just installed Gentoo on a quad-core dual-cpu Xeon E5420
(2.50GHz). 8Gb RAM, 800Gb raid. It's not mine - I've only convinced
the sysadmin to let me play until it needs to be used for something real
(what a waste to have
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu but
find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level of
customization that I can do with it.
However, I do have a few worries - why has there been no 2007.1 release
(there was a 2006.1 from what I recall)? There
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
but find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level
of customization that I can do with it.
However, I do have a few worries - why has there been no 2007.1
release (there was a 2006.1 from
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
but find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level
of customization that I can do with it.
However, I do have a few worries - why has there been no 2007.1
release (there was a 2006.1 from
Dale wrote:
Jamie Dobbs wrote:
Also I'm not running at Athlon X2 system, ifs there any _real_
advantage to running AMD64 or should I still to x86?
Just a few questions before I plunge in to it again :-)
No clue on this one. I'm not building a 64 bit rig until I know I can
use it and it
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Jamie Dobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu but
find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level of
customization that I can do with it.
However, I do have a few worries - why
Hi Jamie,
Jamie Dobbs schrieb:
Also I'm not running at Athlon X2 system, ifs there any _real_ advantage
to running AMD64 or should I still to x86?
Just a few questions before I plunge in to it again :-)
you need a 64-bit system only if you have more then 4GB memory on your
pc. If not I
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in
all. Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
You and everybody else.
Plus tons of ram, 1TB storage and a good graphics subsystem. Yeah!
Uwe
--
Informal Linux Group
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in all.
Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
Huh. Dunno about that. I have a Core2 Duo with 2G RAM here and took
kdeenablefinal out of USE
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in all.
Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
Huh. Dunno about that. I have a Core2 Duo with 2G RAM here and took
kdeenablefinal out of USE last night. Started emerge
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
P. S. Is this coming through as plain text?
Yes. They all do that, sir :-)
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -ep world | genlop -p
These are the pretended packages: (this may take a while; wait...)
SNIP one lng list
Estimated update time: 1 day, 20 hours, 53 minutes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / #
Hmmm.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:39 +0100, KH wrote:
only thing I found out until now is that flash is not working. Maybe
this is fixed by now.
Install nspluginwrapper and the vast majority of flash sites work.
Progress is being made then. The last I heard the
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 schrieb ext Alan McKinnon:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in all.
Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
Huh. Dunno about that. I have a Core2 Duo with 2G RAM here and took
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in
all. Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
You and everybody else.
Plus tons of ram, 1TB storage and a good graphics subsystem. Yeah!
Uwe
--
Informal Linux Group
Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Kristian Poul Herkild
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in
all. Compile times would be pretty
Uwe Thiem wrote:
BTW, you can reduce the downloads by a large margin using deltup.
Uwe
Dial-up user reporting in here. What is this feature you speak of
here? How does this work?
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
I would love to build a rig with two dual core CPUs, 4 cores in
all. Compile times would be pretty short. ;-) Woo Ooo.
You and everybody else.
Plus tons
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:39 +0100, KH wrote:
only thing I found out until now is that flash is not working. Maybe
this is fixed by now.
Install nspluginwrapper and the vast majority of flash sites work.
--
Neil Bothwick
Actually, Microsoft is sort of a mixture between the Borg and the
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I also see that kde-4.0.2 just hit portage, complete with 345M of
sources to be downloaded.
It's compiling here right now. On two boxes using distcc.
BTW, you can reduce the downloads by a large margin using deltup.
The other lads in the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
P. S. Is this coming through as plain text?
Yes. They all do that, sir :-)
Thanks. Any time they don't, let me know. Here or any other list.
I'll get my hammer if needed. :-@
Dale
:-) :-)
--
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:29:59 +0100 (CET), Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Make it 2 TB - 1 TB is not enough. But what a machine to compile OO.o
with... not bad, ehh? *drooling*
Forget compiling OOo, that machine would be fast enough to run it ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
In space, no one can hear you
There should be gentoo-chat list
--
Amar Ćosić
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+38761240095
http://www.amar.co.ba
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
KDE 3 is known for its long build times. Thanks to the new build
system, KDE 4 builds orders of magnitude faster (kdelibs 4 build
takes way less than an hour on my Core 2 Duo laptop, while kdelibs
3 takes more than 3 hours).
Oh, oh, oh. 1 hour
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:29:59 +0100 (CET), Kristian Poul Herkild
wrote:
Make it 2 TB - 1 TB is not enough. But what a machine to compile
OO.o with... not bad, ehh? *drooling*
Forget compiling OOo, that machine would be fast enough to run it
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Amar Cosic wrote:
There should be gentoo-chat list
There is one. We call it gentoo-user.
It's a rite-of-passage thing. When you figure out the *real* purpose of
gentoo-user, then we let you into the inner circle.
Next week's lesson is to figure out the *real* mailing
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
Uwe Thiem wrote:
BTW, you can reduce the downloads by a large margin using deltup.
Uwe
Dial-up user reporting in here. What is this feature you speak
of here? How does this work?
Instead of downloading the whole tarball of a new version of a
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 07:22:38 Jamie Dobbs wrote:
I do have a few worries - why has there been no 2007.1 release (there was
a 2006.1 from what I recall)?
Gentoo does not have versions. What you're quoting is the version of the
installation CD, which doesn't have to keep up with the
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 schrieb ext Uwe Thiem:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
KDE 3 is known for its long build times. Thanks to the new build
system, KDE 4 builds orders of magnitude faster (kdelibs 4 build
takes way less than an hour on my Core 2 Duo laptop, while
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:39 +0100, KH wrote:
only thing I found out until now is that flash is not working. Maybe
this is fixed by now.
Install nspluginwrapper and the vast majority of flash sites work.
cool. Never missed it but it's nice to have it. Thanx
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu but
find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the level of
customization that I can do with it.
Well then, welcome back.
SNIP
Also I'm
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 11:02:16 Dale wrote:
[...]
I'm sticking with KDE 3 right now. With this dial-up and the frequency
of updates, it's just not worth it right now. By the time I get it
updated a new set of updates is coming out.
Guess I'm nuts since I run kde-svn... ;)
--
Naga
--
On Dienstag, 11. März 2008, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
However, I do have a few worries - why has there been no 2007.1 release
(there was a 2006.1 from what I recall)?
security problems popping up always at the wrong time made it almost
impossible. So they scrapped it and concentrated on doing the
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Naga wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 11:02:16 Dale wrote:
[...]
I'm sticking with KDE 3 right now. With this dial-up and the
frequency of updates, it's just not worth it right now. By the
time I get it updated a new set of updates is coming out.
Guess I'm
Alan McKinnon wrote:
wellwhaddayaknow. There's at least one person in the world more nuts
than me:
kde-4.0.2
e17-cvs
:-)
Make that two. o_O
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--- Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:39:39 +0100, KH wrote:
only thing I found out until now is that flash is not working.
Maybe
this is fixed by now.
Install nspluginwrapper and the vast majority of flash sites work.
Yep, running AMD64 at home. For the most
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
wellwhaddayaknow. There's at least one person in the world more
nuts than me:
kde-4.0.2
e17-cvs
:-)
Make that two. o_O
Bugger. Here's me thinking I was unique in the world.
I reckon that fellow who was hinting earlier
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:08:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Bugger. Here's me thinking I was unique in the world.
You are, just like everyone else :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you hear about the blind prostitute? You have to hand it to her.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
51 matches
Mail list logo
