Re: [gentoo-user] What is the recommended order of maintenance updates?

2005-04-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:45:55 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Just my 2 cents but I've found with Gentoo that you can really be almost 'too up to date'. What I mean by this is that many packages seems to go through a lot of very small incremental updates. - package -0.4.2_rc1 becomes rc2 becomes

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the recommended order of maintenance updates?

2005-04-23 Thread William Kenworthy
In my experience, you may get away with this regime for a short time on an almost new system, but it will almost invariably break an older system (due to emerge depclean) The safest/most reasonable order is emerge sync glsa-check -l|grep \[N glsa-check -f AnyPackagesReportedAbove revdep-rebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the recommended order of maintenance updates?

2005-04-23 Thread Graham Murray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good point, Eric. Your point being that unless you stop and restart all running daemons or other executables, you can't be sure that an updated library is really being used. But you can easily check if anything is using an old (replaced) library. lsof | grep DEL

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the recommended order of maintenance updates?

2005-04-23 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote: This is not totally true, default useflag changes because emerge --sync update profiles or because you 've installed a particular package. This mean that after an emerge --sync sometimes run emerge --update --deep --newuse world is needed *twice* not only one time

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the recommended order of maintenance updates?

2005-04-22 Thread michael
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Eric S. Johansson wrote: Dave Nebinger wrote: Reboots only come in if I build a new kernel. And it is often times easier to manually restart the services that have been updated rather than rebooting the box. I also suggest rebooting after major library updates to make sure