Hello,
Can anyone tell me why portage is insisting on upgrading me from
opencv-2.4.5 to opencv-2.4.8?
I would not expect portage to want to do this because:
1. opencv-2.4.8 is unstable (and I run a stable system)
2. opencv-2.4.5 is masked
Thank you,
Chris
=
jane ~ # grep opencv
On 29/03/2014 01:05, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone tell me why portage is insisting on upgrading me from
opencv-2.4.5 to opencv-2.4.8?
It's not doing that.
You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
have a version that's in the tree. The only stable
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
have a version that's in the tree. The only stable version is 2.4.5 but
you have masked that in package.mask
Hi Alan,
I attempted to mask only
On 29/03/2014 01:48, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
You need opencv as it's a dep for something, and portage wants you to
have a version that's in the tree. The only stable version is 2.4.5 but
you have masked that in
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You did post emerge output using -t and it shows up at the top level
which is a bit odd, it implies portage wants to update opencv anyway,
not as a result of it being a dep.
I agree it's odd and I agree it appears
5 matches
Mail list logo
