On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 09:20:59 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 21:00, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 20:21:03 CEST, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:10 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 03:38:15 PM Alan McKinnon
On 13/08/2014 08:38, J. Roeleveld wrote:
The good thing about php is that everyone and their dog can knock out
running code.
The bad thing about php is that they do.
Not PHP's fault, lazy developers' fault.
I disagree. It starts with the language.
If a language makes it trivially simple
On Wed 13 Aug 2014 03:10:22 AM EDT, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Bash is also like that, omfg; bash seems to have been designed to make
decent code fundamentally impossible to write...
I mean, if you're trying to write anything more than a screenful in Bash
you should definitely use Ruby or Python
On 13/08/2014 14:18, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
On Wed 13 Aug 2014 03:10:22 AM EDT, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Bash is also like that, omfg; bash seems to have been designed to make
decent code fundamentally impossible to write...
I mean, if you're trying to write anything more than a screenful in
On 12/08/2014 07:36, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:45:07 PM Mick wrote:
On Monday 11 Aug 2014 20:01:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
isn't it great? back in the days when kmail stored emails in files,
everything worked great and even folders with 100k mails were not a
On Sunday 10 Aug 2014 10:34:44 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Saturday, August 09, 2014 09:00:48 PM Mick wrote:
First some general observations that relate to kmail2:
I thought of giving the latest kmail-4.12.5 a spin. So installed it on a
machine and set up a couple of IMAP4 servers to get
On Tuesday 12 Aug 2014 07:42:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 07:36, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:45:07 PM Mick wrote:
On Monday 11 Aug 2014 20:01:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
isn't it great? back in the days when kmail stored emails in files,
everything worked
On 12/08/2014 11:10, Mick wrote:
I recall the devs explicitly stating early enough in the KDE4 development
that
sqlite is not man enough for the job and advising everyone to move over to
mysql.
Someone was looking at postgresql as an alternative to mysql, but I'm not
sure
that this
On 12 August 2014 14:06:07 CEST, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2014 11:10, Mick wrote:
I recall the devs explicitly stating early enough in the KDE4
development that
sqlite is not man enough for the job and advising everyone to move
over to
mysql.
Someone was
On 12/08/2014 15:28, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 14:06:07 CEST, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/08/2014 11:10, Mick wrote:
I recall the devs explicitly stating early enough in the KDE4
development that
sqlite is not man enough for the job and advising everyone
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 03:38:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 15:28, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 14:06:07 CEST, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/08/2014 11:10, Mick wrote:
I recall the devs explicitly stating early enough in the KDE4
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:10 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 03:38:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 15:28, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 14:06:07 CEST, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/08/2014 11:10, Mick wrote:
I recall the devs explicitly
On 12 August 2014 20:21:03 CEST, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:10 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 03:38:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 15:28, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 14:06:07 CEST, Alan McKinnon
On 12/08/2014 21:00, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August 2014 20:21:03 CEST, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:10 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 03:38:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 12/08/2014 15:28, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 12 August
Am 09.08.2014 um 22:00 schrieb Mick:
First some general observations that relate to kmail2:
I thought of giving the latest kmail-4.12.5 a spin. So installed it on a
machine and set up a couple of IMAP4 servers to get messages from. An
account
with a messages in the low hundreds works
On Monday 11 Aug 2014 20:01:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
isn't it great? back in the days when kmail stored emails in files,
everything worked great and even folders with 100k mails were not a problem.
But, no, they had to break that.
I lost ca 500k emails thanks to akonadi-crap and
On Saturday, August 09, 2014 09:00:48 PM Mick wrote:
First some general observations that relate to kmail2:
I thought of giving the latest kmail-4.12.5 a spin. So installed it on a
machine and set up a couple of IMAP4 servers to get messages from. An
account with a messages in the low
On Monday, August 11, 2014 10:45:07 PM Mick wrote:
On Monday 11 Aug 2014 20:01:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
isn't it great? back in the days when kmail stored emails in files,
everything worked great and even folders with 100k mails were not a
problem.
But, no, they had to break
First some general observations that relate to kmail2:
I thought of giving the latest kmail-4.12.5 a spin. So installed it on a
machine and set up a couple of IMAP4 servers to get messages from. An account
with a messages in the low hundreds works fine. An account with messages in
the 100k
19 matches
Mail list logo
