Alex wrote:
Now I'm emerging -e world with -Os. When it is finished, I'll mail you
the results.
Hi,
now I have a -Os-system and it isn't faster. So now I'll emerge the
whole system again, but with -O3.
Alex
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
You have to do experiments. It depends heavily on your application
mix.
Yes, that would be the best, but I'm wondering how, because e.g. time
bzip2 -9 foobar wouldn't be helpfull. So now I've switched to -Os and
soon I can test, if it's a real difference.
Thank you!
At Thu, 25 May 2006 10:40:26 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
You have to do experiments. It depends heavily on your application
mix.
Yes, that would be the best, but I'm wondering how, because e.g. time
bzip2 -9 foobar wouldn't be helpfull. So now I've switched to
Philip Webb wrote:
My experience is that 'eclean' is not efficient at removing
things, so I've gone back to removing out-of-date distfiles by
hand.
Not even 'eclean-dist --destructive' is enough?
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
At Thu, 25 May 2006 10:40:26 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
You have to do experiments. It depends heavily on your application
mix.
Yes, that would be the best, but I'm wondering how, because e.g. time
bzip2 -9 foobar wouldn't be helpfull.
At Thu, 25 May 2006 18:21:39 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
At Thu, 25 May 2006 10:40:26 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
You have to do experiments. It depends heavily on your application
mix.
Yes, that would be the best, but I'm
Hi! May be it is a stupid question, but can I remove the content of /usr/portage/distfile/ without problems? This file has a size of 1.5 GB ! I would like to have some space back ;) JC
Mails löschen war gestern:
Yahoo! Mail jetzt mit 1GB kostenlosem Speicher
.
On Wednesday, 24 May 2006 23:56, JC Denton wrote:
Hi!
May be it is a stupid question, but can I remove the content of
/usr/portage/distfile/ without problems? This file has a size of 1.5 GB !
I would like to have some space back ;)
JC
Yes you may safely remove anything that you no
I think you meant /usr/portage/distfiles, right? Yes, you can remove
them. They are the source archives of the packages you've installed.
But, if you need to reemerge any of your packages, you'll have to
download it again.
PS.: JC Denton is from Deus Ex?
On 5/24/06, JC Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JC Denton a gentiment tapote:
Hi!
May be it is a stupid question, but can I remove the content of
/usr/portage/distfile/ without problems? This file has a size of 1.5
GB ! I would like to have some space back ;)
JC
On Wed, 24 May 2006 16:26:43 +0200 (CEST), JC Denton wrote:
May be it is a stupid question, but can I remove the content of
/usr/portage/distfile/ without problems? This file has a size of 1.5
GB ! I would like to have some space back ;)
Yes you can, but it may mean you have to download
Yes! I think it is a great game.Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I think you meant /usr/portage/distfiles, right? Yes, you can removethem. They are the source archives of the packages you've installed.But, if you need to reemerge any of your packages, you'll have
Hi,
There is a utility called eclean which is meant for the purpose ..
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Free_up_disk_space_in_Gentoo
Hope this helps
Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
znx wrote:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Free_up_disk_space_in_Gentoo
Using CFLAGS=-Os or CFLAGS=-O2 is much more effective on
a desktop system and can shave off more than 30% of the size. This is
because larger binaries (like the HUGE ones produced by -O3)
take longer to load, and
At Wed, 24 May 2006 20:52:21 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
znx wrote:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Free_up_disk_space_in_Gentoo
Using CFLAGS=-Os or CFLAGS=-O2 is much more effective on
a desktop system and can shave off more than 30% of the size. This is
because larger
On 5/24/06, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using CFLAGS=-Os or CFLAGS=-O2 is much more effective on
a desktop system and can shave off more than 30% of the size. This is
because larger binaries (like the HUGE ones produced by -O3)
take longer to load, and occupy more RAM.
Is that
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Often the bigger problem with large binaries is that their working
sets exceeds the sizes of the L1 and (possibly) L2 caches.
Well, I'm using -O3 and I have 1Mb L2, do you think I should migrate
to -Os?
Richard Fish wrote:
the real deciding factor was that it took a
060524 znx wrote:
There is a utility called eclean which is meant for the purpose ..
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Free_up_disk_space_in_Gentoo
My experience is that 'eclean' is not efficient at removing things,
so I've gone back to removing out-of-date distfiles by hand.
--
At Wed, 24 May 2006 23:24:50 + Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Often the bigger problem with large binaries is that their working
sets exceeds the sizes of the L1 and (possibly) L2 caches.
Well, I'm using -O3 and I have 1Mb L2, do you think I should migrate
to -Os?
19 matches
Mail list logo
