Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:58:23 +, Mick wrote: On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +, Mick wrote: But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-06 Thread Mick
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +, Mick wrote: But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-04 Thread Mick
On Saturday 03 Dec 2011 16:45:19 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:48AM -0500, Indi wrote: About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused portage to lose the ability to work verbosely. Ever since it looks like this: paste idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-04 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:27:33AM +, Mick wrote: Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage, etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge anymore no matter what. Other than that everything is working fine, but I do need to see

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-04 Thread Mick
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 14:05:29 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:27:33AM +, Mick wrote: Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage, etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge anymore no matter what. Other than

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +, Mick wrote: But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error? Which is why setting -j 1 sets wh -- Neil

[gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-03 Thread Indi
Howdy y'all, About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused portage to lose the ability to work verbosely. Ever since it looks like this: paste idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-03 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. If you want the old behaviour back, you can add EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n to your make.conf So long Hinnerk On 03.12.2011 15:23, Indi wrote: Howdy y'all, About a month or so ago I

Emerge ignoring make.conf entries [was Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch]

2011-12-03 Thread Indi
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 03:40:01PM +0100, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. Hmm, I always thought the -v was the verbose switch, and that it should work properly regardless of what's in

Re: Emerge ignoring make.conf entries [was Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch]

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote: that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. Hmm, I always thought the -v was the verbose switch, and that it should work properly regardless of what's in make.conf. It *used* to work properly here, I've been using emerge -vauND world to

Re: Emerge ignoring make.conf entries [was Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch]

2011-12-03 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03.12.2011 17:09, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote: that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. Hmm, I always thought the -v was the verbose switch, and that it should work properly regardless of what's

Re: Emerge ignoring make.conf entries [was Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch]

2011-12-03 Thread Indi
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote: that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. Hmm, I always thought the -v was the verbose switch, and that it should work properly regardless of what's in make.conf. It

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-03 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:48AM -0500, Indi wrote: About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused portage to lose the ability to work verbosely. Ever since it looks like this: paste idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash These are the packages that