Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente:
Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI for
the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff with 4.9
you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had very few
things that failed to compile[1],
Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente:
Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI
for the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff
with 4.9 you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had
very few things that failed to
Ok
so I'm still on 4.7.3; but if I set 4.8.3
as the default, should I rebuild @system ?
# gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.3
I saw the news item about 4.8.3-SSP, which I think is a good idea, but
how deeply, if at all, do I need to rebuild packages
so I'm still on 4.7.3; but if I set 4.8.3
as the default, should I rebuild @system ?
# gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.3
I saw the news item about 4.8.3-SSP, which I think is a good idea, but
how deeply, if at all, do I need to rebuild packages ?
Is
* James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com [141107 12:47]:
Ok
so I'm still on 4.7.3; but if I set 4.8.3
as the default, should I rebuild @system ?
# gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.3
I saw the news item about 4.8.3-SSP, which I think is a good
5 matches
Mail list logo