Dan Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:19:38 -0500
Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A slightly educated guess would be the gdbm package, though you'd
think it would be named libgdbm.so as opposed to gdbm.so.
--
Albert W. Hopkins
Yes, but I don't have it installed:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Indeed there exists no authoritative source that can be used to show that if
no package on your system claims to own a given file...
http://www.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de/~fejf/cgi-bin/pfs-web.pl is the closest
you can get currently..
Thanks!
According to
Hi, list!
It appears I have a lib (gdbm.so) left behind by some removed package.
Could somebody, please, tell me which package does this file belong to?
revdep-rebuild -X -i -pv
Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
Checking reverse dependencies...
Packages
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:02 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
It appears I have a lib (gdbm.so) left behind by some removed
package.
Could somebody, please, tell me which package does this file belong
to?
A slightly educated guess would be the gdbm package, though you'd
think it would be named
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:19:38 -0500
Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:02 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
It appears I have a lib (gdbm.so) left behind by some removed
package.
Could somebody, please, tell me which package does this file belong
to?
A slightly
On Saturday 14 April 2007 07:23:59 Dan Farrell wrote:
equery takes the guesswork out of package manangement:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ equery belongs gdbm.so
| [ Searching for file(s) gdbm.so in *... ]
| dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4 (/usr/lib64/python2.4/lib-dynload/gdbm.so)
|
6 matches
Mail list logo
