On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:15:09 +0100, bn wrote:
I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
an emerge -e system / emerge -e
Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:15:09 +0100, bn wrote:
I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
an
Hi,
I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating, among
those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now* for
work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all with
an emerge -e system / emerge -e world, but more and more packages want
to
100226 bn wrote:
I have a stable x86 system that requires still a bit of updating,
among those libtool and gcc. Since I need the system to be usable *now*
for work reasons, I don't feel like updating gcc and rebuilding it all
with an emerge -e system / emerge -e world,
but more and more
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
files don't exist.
/usr/share/libtool/ltmain.sh
/usr/share/libtool/config.sub
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
files don't exist.
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken. There were links to the following files, but now those
files don't
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken. There were links to the
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 06 Oktober 2009, dhk wrote:
I recently ran a make clean on a C/Gtk program I'm developing and now
can't run ./configure to rebuild it. It looks like all my libtool links
are broken.
Hi,
unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libpcreposix.la'
The libtool command is too long to include here, but it definitely
doesn't contain
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:45 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libpcreposix.la'
The libtool command is too long
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:59 +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
There was a bug about this (libpcre not installing the .la files).
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266016 should be it btw..
Philipp
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:45:19 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately, libtool is one of my black spots in my Linux knowlegde.
Trying to emerge app-editors/kile-2.0.3-r1 libtool fails with
libtool: link: cannot find the library
Hi,
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2
anymore.
I have rebuilt libtool,
Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
On 3 Feb, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3
On Dienstag 03 Februar 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
On 3 Feb, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 13:15:55 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I
On 3 Feb, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Re-emerge gcc-4.3.3 - this was fixed without a revision bump.
^^^
I do love this !!!
Many thanks,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:03:00 +0100 (CET)
Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
I do love this !!!
And I hate to re-emerge same gcc every time some minor bug (which I
didn't happen to reproduce) is fixed.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:23:17 +0500, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
And I hate to re-emerge same gcc every time some minor bug (which I
didn't happen to reproduce) is fixed.
IKWYM but I think, on balance, this one would have benefited from a bump
as the effects of the breakage were quite widespread. It
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:15:55 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
since a short time many (not all) packages fail to build with a message
like
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/libgomp.la
The problem is that I have upgraded to gcc-4.3.3 so there is no path
I understand this is just a warning but has Gentoo made itself somehow
not so friendly for us common folk who are not programmers? As
probably many know, I've been running Gentoo for 3-4 years. I've never
had problems like I've had recently with Gentoo. Excuse my frustration
but many things seem
I'm having trouble emerging programs like libmng and libtool.
The problem looks like this:
==
Running autotools in '.' ...
/usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4:36: warning: underquoted definition of
AM_OPTIONS_WXCONFIG
run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
I'm having trouble emerging programs like libmng and libtool.
The problem looks like this:
==
snip
/usr/share/aclocal/path_dps.m4:172: file `path_dps.m4' does not exist
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.20 failed.
!!! Function
Great, it is merging again.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:02:00PM +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
Yes, emerge dgs:
dgs
Description: fake ebuild to force removal of broken path_dps.m4
Then try your emerge again.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
