Rudmer van Dijk writes:
On Monday 09 November 2009, Dale wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
well it turns out that sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 has suddenly been license
masked...
adding ACCEPT_LICENSE=dlj-1.1 to make.conf lets sun-jdk be
accepted again. no more spontaneous forced installation
Dale wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
after sync, portage wants to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin, although there is
a jdk installed (I already had dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17)
well it turns out that sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 has suddenly been license masked...
adding ACCEPT_LICENSE=dlj-1.1 to make.conf
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 21:01:52 Jarry wrote:
Dale wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
after sync, portage wants to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin, although
there is a jdk installed (I already had dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17)
well it turns out that sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 has suddenly been license
Hi,
for all who have problems with their jdk (and don't want to spent half an hour
finding out why 8-):
after sync, portage wants to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin, although there is
a jdk installed (I already had dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17)
well it turns out that sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 has suddenly
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
for all who have problems with their jdk (and don't want to spent half an
hour
finding out why 8-):
after sync, portage wants to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin, although there is
a jdk installed (I already had dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17)
well it turns out that
On Monday 09 November 2009, Dale wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
well it turns out that sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 has suddenly been license
masked...
adding ACCEPT_LICENSE=dlj-1.1 to make.conf lets sun-jdk be accepted
again. no more spontaneous forced installation of icedtea6-bin!
I cheated
Thanks dale, adding :)
On 11/9/09, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
for all who have problems with their jdk (and don't want to spent half an
hour
finding out why 8-):
after sync, portage wants to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin, although there
is
a jdk
7 matches
Mail list logo
