On 06 May 2006 20:26, John Blinka wrote:
Uwe Thiem wrote:
Right. Somewhat besides your question: Are you really using hubs? I also
seem to remember from your original post that the terminals are connected
by 10Mb/s which makes sense if you are using hubs. From my experience
with server /
The /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file needed another line:
next-server ip-address-of-server;
with the upgrade to dhcp-3.0.3 (and maybe a version or
two earlier). With that addition, all is now well.
John Blinka
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 09 May 2006 19:15, John Blinka wrote:
The /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf file needed another line:
next-server ip-address-of-server;
with the upgrade to dhcp-3.0.3 (and maybe a version or
two earlier). With that addition, all is now well.
Thanks for hitting this before me! ;-)
Uwe
--
Mark
Uwe Thiem wrote:
Try to correct the broadcast above. Maybe that will solve the problem already,
although it's hard to understand how you fat clients can work with it.
I corrected the broadcast address, but it didn't help.
If the broadcast doesn't solve it, please post your
On 08 May 2006 19:12, John Blinka wrote:
Uwe Thiem wrote:
Try to correct the broadcast above. Maybe that will solve the problem
already, although it's hard to understand how you fat clients can work
with it.
I corrected the broadcast address, but it didn't help.
If the broadcast doesn't
On 05 May 2006 19:57, John Blinka wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
How are the boxes connected to the network? A hub? A switch? Router
maybe? Try using the network spot (where one of the failing boxes is
connected) with a notebook or another machine that you know has no
problems. Also check
Uwe Thiem wrote:
Right. Somewhat besides your question: Are you really using hubs? I also seem
to remember from your original post that the terminals are connected by
10Mb/s which makes sense if you are using hubs. From my experience with
server / thin client configurations, I would suggest
On 06 May 2006 20:26, John Blinka wrote:
Uwe Thiem wrote:
We originally used hubs and later moved to switches - my mistake. But
it hasn't made much difference in performance. Our performance bottleneck
is elsewhere. But that's another discussion.
Alright, but I would really like to
Hi,
I help out with a local school using an ltsp server to run 50-60 ancient
pentium boxes as terminals. I've run gentoo and ltsp on this server for
almost
a year without problems. However, a few weeks ago there had been a sudden
power outage (and no ups) which took the server and terminals
On 5/5/06, John Blinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I help out with a local school using an ltsp server to run 50-60 ancient
pentium boxes as terminals. I've run gentoo and ltsp on this server for
almost
a year without problems. However, a few weeks ago there had been a sudden
power outage
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
How are the boxes connected to the network? A hub? A switch? Router
maybe? Try using the network spot (where one of the failing boxes is
connected) with a notebook or another machine that you know has no
problems. Also check the cables and other network devices between
11 matches
Mail list logo
